Daniel C. Dey

5.6k citations
187 papers · 3.9k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel C. Dey

176 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

Daniel C. Dey
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.7k
  • Global and Planetary Change 2.5k
  • Ecology 1.3k
  • Insect Science 563
  • Soil Science 231
Replace Kevin L. O’Hara with:
Kevin L. O’Hara United States
Barton D. Clinton United States
Magnus Löf Sweden
Constance A. Harrington United States
Chadwick Dearing Oliver United States
Philip J. Burton Canada
Douglas A. Maguire United States
Alain Leduc Canada
Klaus J. Puettmann United States
Philip G. Comeau Canada
Daniel C. Dey relative to Kevin L. O’Hara United States Kevin L. O’Hara's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Kevin L. O’Hara · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Dey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Dey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Dey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Dey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Dey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Dey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Dey. The network helps show where Daniel C. Dey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel C. Dey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel C. Dey Line = papers co-authored together Daniel C. Dey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 187 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012198
2 2012164
3 2014154
4 2013153
5 2012139
6 2005106
7 1997100
8 200899
9 200897
10 201681
11 201879
12 200264
13 201258
14 201857
15
The ecological basis for oak silviculture in Eastern North America.
200256
16 200254
17
The Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project: past, present, and future
199750
18 200848
19 201647
20 201147

About Daniel C. Dey

Daniel C. Dey is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Insect Science and Plant Science, having authored 187 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fire effects on ecosystems (98 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (76 papers), Forest ecology and management (72 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (51 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (40 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (28 papers), Forest Management and Policy (24 papers) and Tree-ring climate responses (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.7k citations), Global and Planetary Change (2.5k citations), Ecology (1.3k citations), Insect Science (563 citations) and Soil Science (231 citations). Daniel C. Dey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Iran and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Callie J. Schweitzer, John M. Kabrick, Richard P. Guyette, William C. Parker, Michael C. Stambaugh, Douglass F. Jacobs, Randy G. Jensen, Justin L. Hart, Rose‐Marie Muzika and Patrick H. Brose. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Forest Science, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Journal of Forestry and New Forests.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact