William C. Lemon
Impact in
- Biophysics top 0.2%
- Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
- Cell Image Analysis Techniques
- Structural Biology top 2%
Papers in
- Biophysics 14
- Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques 12
- Cell Image Analysis Techniques 10
- Co-authors
- Philipp KellerYinan WanKatie McDoleFernando AmatBurkhard HöckendorfRaghav K. ChhetriEugene W. MyersKristin Branson
- Journals
- Nature Methods (3 papers)Journal of Comparative Physiology A (3 papers)Journal of Neuroscience (2 papers)Nature Biotechnology (2 papers)Nature Protocols (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
William C. Lemon
33 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Biophysics 836
- Structural Biology 86
- Aging 89
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 645
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 170
Countries citing papers authored by William C. Lemon
This map shows the geographic impact of William C. Lemon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. Lemon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. Lemon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William C. Lemon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. Lemon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. Lemon. The network helps show where William C. Lemon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William C. Lemon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 36 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 45 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 7 | A general method to fine-tune fluorophores for live-cell and in vivo imaging Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 477 |
| 8 | 2016 | 114 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 173 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 160 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 137 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 85 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 196 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 224 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 12 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 6 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 8 | |
| 19 | 1992 | 11 | |
| 20 | Foraging Behavior of a Guild of Neotropical Vultures | 1991 | 12 |
About William C. Lemon
William C. Lemon is a scholar working on Biophysics, Structural Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (12 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (10 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (9 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (5 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (5 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (4 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (4 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (836 citations), Structural Biology (86 citations), Aging (89 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (645 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (170 citations). William C. Lemon has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Philipp Keller, Yinan Wan, Katie McDole, Fernando Amat, Burkhard Höckendorf, Raghav K. Chhetri, Eugene W. Myers, Kristin Branson, Michael N. Nitabach and Benjamin H. White. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Methods, Journal of Comparative Physiology A, Journal of Neuroscience, Nature Biotechnology and Nature Protocols.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.