A general method to fine-tune fluorophores for live-cell and in vivo imaging

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 467 indexed citations. Written by Jonathan B. Grimm, Anand K. Muthusamy, Yajie Liang, Timothy A. Brown, William C. Lemon, Ronak Patel, Rongwen Lu, J. J. Macklin, Philipp Keller and Na Ji covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (232 citations), Biophysics (169 citations) and Materials Chemistry (121 citations). Published in Nature Methods.

Countries where authors are citing A general method to fine-tune fluorophores for live-cell and in vivo imaging

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A general method to fine-tune fluorophores for live-cell and in vivo imaging. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A general method to fine-tune fluorophores for live-cell and in vivo imaging with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A general method to fine-tune fluorophores for live-cell and in vivo imaging more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A general method to fine-tune fluorophores for live-cell and in vivo imaging

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A general method to fine-tune fluorophores for live-cell and in vivo imaging. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A general method to fine-tune fluorophores for live-cell and in vivo imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4403.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026