William C. Cooper

1.6k citations
38 papers · 868 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

William C. Cooper

38 papers receiving 790 citations

Peers

William C. Cooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 308
  • Plant Science 298
  • Organic Chemistry 213
  • Insect Science 79
  • Cell Biology 66
Replace Ruud Kraayenhof with:
Ruud Kraayenhof Netherlands
H. Bauer Germany
Brian K. Mohney United States
Simon E. Greenough United Kingdom
Wolfgang Gregor Austria
L. Kittler Austria
J. Mattai United States
Sangjin Hong United States
Jean Grandjean Belgium
K. Dose Germany
William C. Cooper relative to Ruud Kraayenhof Netherlands Ruud Kraayenhof's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
Ruud Kraayenhof · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William C. Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William C. Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William C. Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. Cooper. The network helps show where William C. Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William C. Cooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William C. Cooper Line = papers co-authored together William C. Cooper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992130
2 1992117
3 200487
4
Control of abscission in agricultural crops and its physiological basis.
196860
5 196954
6 200748
7 195243
8 199441
9 199338
10 199232
11 196629
12 196524
13 197116
14 196915
15 197314
16 200412
17 196910
18 201710
19 19699
20 19588

About William C. Cooper

William C. Cooper is a scholar working on Plant Science, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Molecular Biology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 868 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (13 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (6 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (4 papers), Plant Surface Properties and Treatments (4 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (4 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (3 papers), Aldose Reductase and Taurine (3 papers) and Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (308 citations), Plant Science (298 citations), Organic Chemistry (213 citations), Insect Science (79 citations) and Cell Biology (66 citations). William C. Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Pi‐Tai Chou, Marty L. Martinez, G. K. Rasmussen, Fiona L. Goggin, Dale McMorrow, Michael Kasha, T.M. Penning, Benjamin J. Rogers, Shannon L. Studer and Richard K. Gershon. Their work appears in journals such as PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Chemical Physics Letters, American Journal of Botany, Neurology and Chemico-Biological Interactions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact