William C. Chapman

7.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
146 papers, 4.3k citations indexed

About

William C. Chapman is a scholar working on Hepatology, Surgery and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, William C. Chapman has authored 146 papers receiving a total of 4.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 87 papers in Hepatology, 67 papers in Surgery and 49 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in William C. Chapman's work include Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (48 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (41 papers) and Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (39 papers). William C. Chapman is often cited by papers focused on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (48 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (41 papers) and Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (39 papers). William C. Chapman collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Italy. William C. Chapman's co-authors include Jeffrey S. Crippin, Neeta Vachharajani, Thalachallour Mohanakumar, Jeffrey A. Lowell, Daniel B. Brown, Surendra Shenoy, C. Wright Pinson, Yiing Lin, Maria B. Majella Doyle and Michael Darcy and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Lancet and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

William C. Chapman

140 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Hit Papers

Ten-Year Outcomes of Liver Transplant and Downstaging for... 2022 2026 2023 2024 2022 25 50 75

Peers

William C. Chapman
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Hepatology 2.3k
  • Surgery 1.7k
  • Epidemiology 1.2k
  • Oncology 655
  • Transplantation 612
Replace Susanne Beckebaum with:
Susanne Beckebaum Germany
J. Klempnauer Germany
Igor Dvorchik United States
Michele Masetti Italy
Frank Lehner Germany
Michael A. Zimmerman United States
D Houssin France
Vincent Audard France
Aksel Foss Norway
Roy Calne United Kingdom
Susanne Beckebaum Germany View profile →
Citations per field, relative to William C. Chapman
William C. Chapman · 1×
Citations per year, relative to William C. Chapman
William C. Chapman · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by William C. Chapman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William C. Chapman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. Chapman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. Chapman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William C. Chapman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. Chapman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. Chapman. The network helps show where William C. Chapman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William C. Chapman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William C. Chapman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William C. Chapman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William C. Chapman. William C. Chapman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 0
3 1
4 0
5 6
6 1
7 6
8 1
9 7
10 8
11 1
12 51
13 143
14 42
15 5
16 4
17 30
18 128
19 99
20 27

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026