Amber L. Simpson

120 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Amber L. Simpson
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Health Informatics 60
  • Hepatology 315
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 794
  • Oncology 498
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 344
Replace Tianye Niu with:
Tianye Niu China
Roger Sun France
Sung Soo Ahn South Korea
Steve Bandula United Kingdom
Sergi Ganau Spain
Alexander Sauter Germany
Hak Hee Kim South Korea
Balaji Ganeshan United Kingdom
Sheng Xu United States
Kazunori Kubota Japan
Amber L. Simpson relative to Tianye Niu China Tianye Niu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Tianye Niu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amber L. Simpson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber L. Simpson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber L. Simpson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber L. Simpson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber L. Simpson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber L. Simpson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber L. Simpson. The network helps show where Amber L. Simpson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amber L. Simpson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amber L. Simpson Line = papers co-authored together Amber L. Simpson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 124 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201890
2 201885
3 201884
4 201981
5 201472
6 201770
7 201769
8 201363
9 201460
10 201958
11 201755
12 201455
13 201855
14 201550
15 202248
16 201245
17 201745
18 201444
19 201843
20 202243

About Amber L. Simpson

Amber L. Simpson is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Surgery and Oncology, having authored 124 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (32 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (18 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (15 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (14 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (12 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (11 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (11 papers) and Augmented Reality Applications (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (60 citations), Hepatology (315 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (794 citations), Oncology (498 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (344 citations). Amber L. Simpson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Richard Kinh Gian, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. Miga, Mithat Gönen, Jayasree Chakraborty, Peter J. Allen, T. Peter Kingham, Thomas S. Pheiffer, Abhishek Midya and Ronald P. DeMatteo. Their work appears in journals such as Abdominal Radiology, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Annals of Surgical Oncology, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering and HPB.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact