William Byne

6.5k citations
84 papers · 4.7k indexed · h-index 39

William Byne

82 papers receiving 4.5k citations

Peers

William Byne
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
  • Biological Psychiatry 264
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.6k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 325
  • Reproductive Medicine 500
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 202
Replace Rebecca Knickmeyer with:
Rebecca Knickmeyer United States
Michel A. Hofman Netherlands
Jonathan D. Blumenthal United States
A. Catherine Vaituzis United States
Armin Raznahan United States
Richard E. Straub United States
Michael Lombardo United Kingdom
Martien J. Kas Netherlands
Henry Szechtman Canada
Gregory L. Wallace United States
William Byne relative to Rebecca Knickmeyer United States Rebecca Knickmeyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Rebecca Knickmeyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Byne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Byne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Byne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Byne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Byne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Byne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Byne. The network helps show where William Byne may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Byne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Byne Line = papers co-authored together William Byne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20225
2 20151
3 201540
4 201459
5 201210
6 201131
7 200933
8 2008186
9 200821
10 200820
11 200741
12 200530
13 200495
14 200248
15 2002203
16 2001132
17 200177
18 199838
19
Interview: The Biological Evidence for Homosexuality Reappraised
19931
20 199130

About William Byne

William Byne is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Reproductive Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Social Psychology, having authored 84 papers that have together received 4.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (21 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (21 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (16 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (16 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (7 papers), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (7 papers), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (7 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (264 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.6k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (325 citations), Reproductive Medicine (500 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (202 citations). William Byne has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Monte S. Buchsbaum, Ruth Bleier, Eileen Kemether, Erin A. Hazlett, Vahram Haroutunian, Stella Dracheva, M. Mehmet Haznedar, Kenneth L. Davis, Liesl B. Jones and Kevin Barley. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, American Journal of Psychiatry, Brain Research, LGBT Health and Biological Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026