William Brown
- Insect Science top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Genetics
- Ecology
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- R. H. WhittakerThomas EisnerDavid L. BentleyMark GroudineHenry A. WallaceNick M. WisdomDavid K. ChenRebecca L. Collins
- Topics
- Fossil Insects in Amber (3 papers)Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (2 papers)Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
William Brown
24 papers receiving 506 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Insect Science 145
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 142
- Genetics 125
- Ecology 73
- Plant Science 68
Countries citing papers authored by William Brown
This map shows the geographic impact of William Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Brown more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Brown
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Brown. The network helps show where William Brown may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Brown
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Brown. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Brown based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Brown. William Brown is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 32 | |
| 5 | Psychological Methods of Healing - An Introduction to Psychotherapy | 1 |
| 6 | 35 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | EMS in 2000: what role will associations play? | 0 |
| 9 | The distal akin osteotomy: a new approach. | 11 |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | Michigan's Strategy for Assessing Employability Skills. | 2 |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 57 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 68 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About William Brown
William Brown is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Applied Psychology and Oceanography, having authored 25 papers that have together received 565 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fossil Insects in Amber (3 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (2 papers) and Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (145 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (142 citations) and Genetics (125 citations). William Brown has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include R. H. Whittaker, Thomas Eisner, David L. Bentley, Mark Groudine, Henry A. Wallace, Nick M. Wisdom, David K. Chen, Rebecca L. Collins, Audrey N. Kalehua and Ronald G. Riechers. Their work appears in journals such as Genes & Development, The American Naturalist and Journal of neurosurgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.