William Brady DeHart
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- General Decision Sciences top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Amy L. OdumWarren K. BickelJonathan E. FriedelBrent A. KaplanDerek PopeAlexandra M. MellisLiqa N. AthamnehSarah E. Snider
- Topics
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (14 papers)Behavioral Health and Interventions (14 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSpain
In The Last Decade
William Brady DeHart
29 papers receiving 687 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Applied Psychology 295
- General Decision Sciences 264
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 175
- Cognitive Neuroscience 113
- Clinical Psychology 107
Countries citing papers authored by William Brady DeHart
This map shows the geographic impact of William Brady DeHart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Brady DeHart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Brady DeHart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Brady DeHart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Brady DeHart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Brady DeHart. The network helps show where William Brady DeHart may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Brady DeHart
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Brady DeHart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Brady DeHart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Brady DeHart. William Brady DeHart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 36 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 124 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 44 | |
| 15 | 40 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | 73 |
About William Brady DeHart
William Brady DeHart is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology and Leadership and Management, having authored 32 papers that have together received 716 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (14 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (14 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (264 citations), Applied Psychology (295 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (175 citations). William Brady DeHart has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Amy L. Odum, Warren K. Bickel, Jonathan E. Friedel, Brent A. Kaplan, Derek Pope, Alexandra M. Mellis, Liqa N. Athamneh, Sarah E. Snider, Julia C. Basso and William H. Craft. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Psychopharmacology and Health Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.