Sarah E. Snider

29 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Sarah E. Snider
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • General Decision Sciences 169
  • Applied Psychology 323
  • Biological Psychiatry 62
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 256
  • Neurology 79
Replace Jin H. Yoon with:
Jin H. Yoon United States
Sarah J Getz United States
Tara L. White United States
Julia Deakin United Kingdom
Maggie M. Sweitzer United States
Lisiane Bizarro Brazil
Catherine Hanak Belgium
E. Terry Mueller United States
Katherine Holshausen Canada
Lana Vedelago Canada
Sarah E. Snider relative to Jin H. Yoon United States Jin H. Yoon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Jin H. Yoon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah E. Snider

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah E. Snider's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah E. Snider with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah E. Snider more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah E. Snider

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah E. Snider. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah E. Snider. The network helps show where Sarah E. Snider may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah E. Snider, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah E. Snider Line = papers co-authored together Sarah E. Snider links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015220
2 2016197
3 201392
4 201791
5 201364
6 201752
7 201943
8 201843
9 202041
10 201240
11 201739
12 201537
13 201536
14 201630
15 201929
16 201925
17 201923
18 201622
19 201821
20 201621

About Sarah E. Snider

Sarah E. Snider is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (9 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (7 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (4 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (169 citations), Applied Psychology (323 citations), Biological Psychiatry (62 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (256 citations) and Neurology (79 citations). Sarah E. Snider has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Puerto Rico and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Warren K. Bickel, Stephen M. LaConte, Jeffrey S. Stein, Amanda J. Quisenberry, Mikhail N. Koffarnus, Alexandra M. Mellis, Patrick M. Beardsley, Derek Pope, Liqa N. Athamneh and William B. DeHart. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors and Health Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact