R. M. Anjos
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 1%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 2%
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology top 0.2%
- Radiation top 0.5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Topics
- Nuclear physics research studies (48 papers)Nuclear Physics and Applications (31 papers)Radioactive contamination and transfer (27 papers)
- Journals
- Physical Review LettersSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Science of The Total Environment
- Partner nations
- BrazilArgentinaUnited States
In The Last Decade
R. M. Anjos
139 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 2.1k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.1k
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 772
- Radiation 721
- Global and Planetary Change 427
Countries citing papers authored by R. M. Anjos
This map shows the geographic impact of R. M. Anjos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. M. Anjos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. M. Anjos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. M. Anjos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. M. Anjos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. M. Anjos. The network helps show where R. M. Anjos may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. M. Anjos
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. M. Anjos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. M. Anjos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. M. Anjos. R. M. Anjos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 54 | |
| 4 | 43 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 37 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 33 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 53 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | Fusion versus Breakup: Observation of Large Fusion Suppression | 1 |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 108 | |
| 17 | 59 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | Brazilian accelerator mass spectrometry program. | 1 |
About R. M. Anjos
R. M. Anjos is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Radiation, having authored 141 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear physics research studies (48 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (31 papers) and Radioactive contamination and transfer (27 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (2.1k citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (772 citations) and Radiation (721 citations). R. M. Anjos has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Argentina and United States. Frequent co-authors include P. R. S. Gomes, J. Lubián, R. Veiga, Kita Macário, Carla Carvalho, I. Padrón, M. Dasgupta, D. J. Hinde, Renan Pereira Cardoso and N. Carlin. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and The Science of The Total Environment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.