William Benedict

2.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

William Benedict is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery and Ophthalmology. According to data from OpenAlex, William Benedict has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Molecular Biology, 2 papers in Surgery and 2 papers in Ophthalmology. Recurrent topics in William Benedict's work include Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers), Cancer Research and Treatments (2 papers) and Virus-based gene therapy research (2 papers). William Benedict is often cited by papers focused on Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers), Cancer Research and Treatments (2 papers) and Virus-based gene therapy research (2 papers). William Benedict collaborates with scholars based in United States, Spain and Russia. William Benedict's co-authors include David W. Dawson, Olga V. Volpert, Noël Bouck, Susan E. Crawford, Hao Xu, Maryellen C. Sparkes, Robert S. Sparkes, A. Linn Murphree, Jorge J. Yunis and Miriam G. Wilson and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Cell and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

William Benedict

9 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Hit Papers

Pigment Epithelium-Derived Factor: A Potent Inhibitor of ... 1999 2026 2008 2017 1999 400 800 1.2k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William Benedict United States 6 912 666 347 295 267 9 1.7k
Shravan K. Chintala United States 27 1.0k 1.1× 687 1.0× 336 1.0× 766 2.6× 426 1.6× 57 2.3k
Lauri Miller United States 12 998 1.1× 600 0.9× 211 0.6× 387 1.3× 444 1.7× 16 2.1k
Donna Hylton United States 8 1.2k 1.3× 631 0.9× 543 1.6× 356 1.2× 544 2.0× 12 2.3k
Gregory S. Robinson United States 22 1.7k 1.9× 1.1k 1.6× 834 2.4× 440 1.5× 398 1.5× 31 3.1k
Michael I. Dorrell United States 25 1.7k 1.9× 1.1k 1.6× 799 2.3× 285 1.0× 192 0.7× 32 2.9k
V. Poulaki United States 17 735 0.8× 277 0.4× 192 0.6× 291 1.0× 300 1.1× 34 1.3k
Quteba Ebrahem United States 18 808 0.9× 289 0.4× 252 0.7× 408 1.4× 222 0.8× 31 1.5k
Jean‐Marie Rakic Belgium 18 884 1.0× 1.0k 1.5× 552 1.6× 498 1.7× 134 0.5× 42 1.8k
Antonella N. Witmer Netherlands 10 965 1.1× 1000 1.5× 604 1.7× 183 0.6× 198 0.7× 12 1.8k
Lea Scheppke United States 10 976 1.1× 283 0.4× 155 0.4× 474 1.6× 161 0.6× 13 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by William Benedict

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Benedict's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Benedict with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Benedict more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Benedict

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Benedict. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Benedict. The network helps show where William Benedict may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Benedict

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Benedict. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Benedict based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Benedict. William Benedict is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Benedict, William, et al.. (2014). DEVELOPMENT AND STANDARDIZATION OF AN INSTRUMENT FOR ASSESSING PRACTICALS AMONG STUDENTS IN COLLEGES OF AGRICULTURE IN NIGERIA. 1 indexed citations
2.
Majewski, Tadeusz, Philippe E. Spiess, Jolanta Bondaruk, et al.. (2012). Detection of Bladder Cancer Using Proteomic Profiling of Urine Sediments. PLoS ONE. 7(8). e42452–e42452. 8 indexed citations
3.
Papageorgiou, Angela, Laura M. Lashinger, Randall E. Millikan, et al.. (2004). Role of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand in Interferon-Induced Apoptosis in Human Bladder Cancer Cells. Cancer Research. 64(24). 8973–8979. 69 indexed citations
4.
Dawson, David W., Olga V. Volpert, Susan E. Crawford, et al.. (1999). Pigment Epithelium-Derived Factor: A Potent Inhibitor of Angiogenesis. Science. 285(5425). 245–248. 1246 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Pollack, Alan, et al.. (1996). Prognostic value of p53 in muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy. Urology. 47(3). 305–310. 42 indexed citations
6.
Deisseroth, A. B., J. J. Kavanagh, Elie G. Hanania, et al.. (1993). Gene therapy: Chemoprotection, immunoenhancement, and modification of tumor cells. 45(2). 139–145. 1 indexed citations
7.
Sparkes, Robert S., Maryellen C. Sparkes, Miriam G. Wilson, et al.. (1980). Regional Assignment of Genes for Human Esterase D and Retinoblastoma to Chromosome Band 13q14. Science. 208(4447). 1042–1044. 267 indexed citations
8.
Kouri, Richard E., Carrie E. Whitmire, & William Benedict. (1975). In vivo and in vitro effects of cigarette smoke condensate fractions. Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research. 16(66). 1 indexed citations
9.
Jones, Peter A., William Benedict, Sidney Strickland, & E. Reich. (1975). Fibrin overlay methods for the detection of single transformed cells and colonies of transformed cells. Cell. 5(3). 323–329. 77 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026