William Baah‐Boateng

19 papers receiving 357 citations

Peers

William Baah‐Boateng
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Economics and Econometrics 195
  • Sociology and Political Science 108
  • General Health Professions 57
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 48
  • Safety Research 47
Replace Christophe Jalil Nordman with:
Christophe Jalil Nordman France
Arya Gaduh United States
Johannes Jütting
Andrew D. Mason United States
Pundarik Mukhopadhaya Australia
Abdul Malik Iddrisu Ghana
Benjamin Feigenberg United States
Arup Banerji
Auguste Tano Kouame United Kingdom
Verena Tandrayen‐Ragoobur Mauritius
William Baah‐Boateng relative to Christophe Jalil Nordman France Christophe Jalil Nordman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Christophe Jalil Nordman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Baah‐Boateng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Baah‐Boateng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Baah‐Boateng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Baah‐Boateng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Baah‐Boateng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Baah‐Boateng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Baah‐Boateng. The network helps show where William Baah‐Boateng may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Baah‐Boateng

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Baah‐Boateng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Baah‐Boateng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Baah‐Boateng. William Baah‐Boateng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 3
3 0
4 5
5 0
6 12
7 13
8 73
9 2
10 42
11 49
12 12
13 9
14 2
15 88
16
The Ghanaian economy: an overview
33
17
Interest Rate Deregulation and Private Investment: Revisiting the McKinnon –Shaw Hypothesis in Ghana
3
18 18
19
Measuring the Gender Asset Gap in Ghana
27
20
Working Paper No. 80 - Growth, Investment and Employment in Ghana
5

About William Baah‐Boateng

William Baah‐Boateng is a scholar working on Public Administration, Economics and Econometrics and Gender Studies, having authored 21 papers that have together received 406 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (6 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (4 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (30 citations), Economics and Econometrics (195 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (48 citations). William Baah‐Boateng has collaborated with scholars based in Ghana, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ernest Aryeetey, Edward Nketiah‐Amponsah, Paul Alagidede, Abena D. Oduro, Cheryl R. Doss, Carmen Diana Deere, Hema Swaminathan, Franklin Amuakwa‐Mensah, Eric Osei‐Assibey and Emmanuel Akyeampong. Their work appears in journals such as World Development, Journal of Economic Studies and International Journal of Manpower.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026