William Ammer

9 total papers · 512 total citations
8 papers, 397 citations indexed

About

William Ammer is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, William Ammer has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 397 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Occupational Therapy, 4 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 4 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in William Ammer's work include Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (5 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (4 papers) and Spinal Cord Injury Research (4 papers). William Ammer is often cited by papers focused on Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (5 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (4 papers) and Spinal Cord Injury Research (4 papers). William Ammer collaborates with scholars based in United States. William Ammer's co-authors include Rory A. Cooper, Michael L. Boninger, Shirley G. Fitzgerald, Rosemarie Cooper, Julianna Arva, Donald M. Spaeth, Stephanie Fitzgerald, Erik Wolf, Andrew J. Rentschler and Richard C. Simpson and has published in prestigious journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology and Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

In The Last Decade

William Ammer

8 papers receiving 352 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
William Ammer	178	171	165	100	53	8	397
Stephanie Fitzgerald	120 0.7×	111 0.6×	151 0.9×	80 0.8×	25 0.5×	17	391
Julianna Arva	173 1.0×	202 1.2×	129 0.8×	142 1.4×	7 0.1×	8	377
Philippe Vaslin	24 0.1×	202 1.2×	44 0.3×	100 1.0×	88 1.7×	35	368
Emily Teodorski	79 0.4×	144 0.8×	36 0.2×	84 0.8×	87 1.6×	14	344
Andrew M. Kwarciak	46 0.3×	279 1.6×	28 0.2×	135 1.4×	45 0.8×	12	335
Leendert Schaake	37 0.2×	66 0.4×	16 0.1×	62 0.6×	20 0.4×	25	443
Michelle Tolerico	156 0.9×	298 1.7×	43 0.3×	163 1.6×	27 0.5×	9	401
Dafne Zuleima Morgado Ramírez	64 0.4×	43 0.3×	35 0.2×	22 0.2×	17 0.3×	21	341
Satoshi Muraki	46 0.3×	49 0.3×	27 0.2×	36 0.4×	128 2.4×	25	344
Riccardo Magni	23 0.1×	25 0.1×	36 0.2×	53 0.5×	7 0.1×	22	395

Countries citing papers authored by William Ammer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Ammer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Ammer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Ammer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Ammer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Ammer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Ammer. The network helps show where William Ammer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Ammer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Ammer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Ammer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Ammer. William Ammer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact