Willa Fields

46 papers receiving 594 citations

Peers

Willa Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 100
  • Research and Theory 24
  • General Health Professions 273
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 16
  • Health Information Management 47
Replace Deborah Morsi with:
Deborah Morsi United States
Diane Storer Brown United States
Élaine Machado de Oliveira Brazil
Rafaela Andolhe Brazil
Fernanda María Togeiro Fugulin Brazil
Garrett K. Chan United States
Nancy Donaldson United States
Joanne McCloskey Dochterman United States
Linda D. Urden United States
João Lucas Campos de Oliveira Brazil
Willa Fields relative to Deborah Morsi United States Deborah Morsi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Deborah Morsi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Willa Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Willa Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Willa Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Willa Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Willa Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Willa Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Willa Fields. The network helps show where Willa Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Willa Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Willa Fields Line = papers co-authored together Willa Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200984
2 201178
3 200962
4 200950
5 201237
6
Mentoring in nursing: a historical approach.
199230
7 200628
8 201027
9
Lessons learned during 15 years of clinical information system experience.
200127
10 201324
11 201716
12 200916
13 201313
14 200513
15 201211
16 201511
17 201810
18 201410
19 20109
20 20159

About Willa Fields

Willa Fields is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Emergency Medical Services, Health Information Management, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 48 papers that have together received 673 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient Safety and Medication Errors (9 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (7 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (6 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (5 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (4 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (3 papers) and Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (100 citations), Research and Theory (24 citations), General Health Professions (273 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (16 citations) and Health Information Management (47 citations). Willa Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Jaynelle F. Stichler, Caroline Brown, Son Chae Kim, Rita Snyder, Ana‐Maria Gallo, Kristine Lund, Tracey McNamara, Nancy N. H. McGough, Christine Tedeschi and Stephanie Scott. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nursing Care Quality, The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, Rehabilitation Nursing, Journal of Emergency Nursing and Critical Care Nurse.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact