Wilhelm Stork

2.3k citations
203 papers · 1.6k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Wilhelm Stork

187 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Wilhelm Stork
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Ophthalmology 216
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 139
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 214
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 594
  • Instrumentation 34
Replace Xenophon Zabulis with:
Xenophon Zabulis Greece
George Azzopardi Netherlands
Takahiro Okabe Japan
Jian Chen China
Zhitao Xiao China
Moustafa H. Aly Egypt
Xirong Li China
Luís Serrano Spain
George Shaker Canada
Hajime Nagahara Japan
Wilhelm Stork relative to Xenophon Zabulis Greece Xenophon Zabulis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Xenophon Zabulis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wilhelm Stork

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wilhelm Stork's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wilhelm Stork with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wilhelm Stork more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wilhelm Stork

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wilhelm Stork. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wilhelm Stork. The network helps show where Wilhelm Stork may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wilhelm Stork, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wilhelm Stork Line = papers co-authored together Wilhelm Stork links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 203 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991153
2 1986105
3 200987
4 200879
5 200577
6 200437
7 200837
8 200432
9 201630
10 201629
11 199228
12 202028
13 201727
14 201425
15 201224
16 201124
17 201019
18 199219
19 201519
20 201418

About Wilhelm Stork

Wilhelm Stork is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Ophthalmology and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 203 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (24 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (17 papers), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (14 papers), Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies (14 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (12 papers), Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (12 papers), Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (12 papers) and Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (216 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (139 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (214 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (594 citations) and Instrumentation (34 citations). Wilhelm Stork has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include N. Streibl, Adolf W. Lohmann, Peter Kipfer, H. Haidner, Rainer Rawer, Jörg Ottenbacher, Johannes Schmid, Klaus D. Müller-Glaser, Stefan Pieh and Christian Lingenfelder. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Letters, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Computers in Biology and Medicine, JMIR Mental Health and Journal of Biomedical Optics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact