Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Wireless sub-THz communication system with high data rate
20131.2k citationsS. Koenig, R. Schmogrow et al.Nature Photonicsprofile →
Nonlinear silicon photonics
2010937 citationsJuerg Leuthold, C. Koos et al.Nature Photonicsprofile →
Microresonator-based solitons for massively parallel coherent optical communications
2017811 citationsPablo Marin-Palomo, J. N. Kemal et al.profile →
What is — and what is not — an optical isolator
2013697 citationsW. Freude et al.Nature Photonicsprofile →
All-optical high-speed signal processing with silicon–organic hybrid slot waveguides
2009662 citationsC. Koos, T. Vallaitis et al.Nature Photonicsprofile →
Ultrafast optical ranging using microresonator soliton frequency combs
2018537 citationsP. Trocha, Maxim Karpov et al.Scienceprofile →
High-speed plasmonic phase modulators
2014474 citationsL. Alloatti, D. Hillerkuss et al.Nature Photonicsprofile →
Coherent terabit communications with microresonator Kerr frequency combs
2014469 citationsJoerg Pfeifle, Victor Brasch et al.Nature Photonicsprofile →
Error Vector Magnitude as a Performance Measure for Advanced Modulation Formats
2011445 citationsR. Schmogrow, Marcus Winter et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of W. Freude's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Freude with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Freude more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Freude. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Freude. The network helps show where W. Freude may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. Freude
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. Freude.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. Freude based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with W. Freude. W. Freude is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Trocha, P., Maxim Karpov, Martin H. P. Pfeiffer, et al.. (2018). Ultrafast optical ranging using microresonator soliton frequency combs. Science. 359(6378). 887–891.537 indexed citations breakdown →
Pfeifle, Joerg, M. Lauermann, Daniel Wegner, et al.. (2013). Coherent data transmission with microresonator Kerr frequency combs. arXiv (Cornell University).4 indexed citations
Freude, W., R. Schmogrow, B. Nebendahl, et al.. (2012). Quality metrics for optical signals: Eye diagram, OSNR, Q-factor, EVM and BER. 21.5 indexed citations
Freude, W.. (1978). Monomode operation of direct modulated GaAlAs DHS injection lasers from 260 Mbit/s up to 1.4 Gbit/s. 32. 105–110.1 indexed citations
19.
Freude, W.. (1977). Measurement of the thermal impedance of injection lasers. 31. 478–480.1 indexed citations
20.
Freude, W.. (1976). Measurement of the statistics of a Gunn-oscillator signal and comparison with a mathematical model. 30. 209–218.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.