W.H. Doesburg
- Urology top 2%
- Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research 6
- Urological Disorders and Treatments 6
- Clinical Biochemistry top 5%
- Metabolism and Genetic Disorders 7
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment 5
- Rheumatology top 5%
-
- Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments 8
-
- Dental Radiography and Imaging 7
-
- Mitochondrial Function and Pathology 5
-
- Diet and metabolism studies 5
- Co-authors
- W.A.J.G. LemmensChris M.G. ThomasK.J.B. LamersChester B. MartinJ. M. van GeelenW.O. RenierC.P.T. SchijfRon A. Wevers
- Journals
- European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (6 papers)The Journal of Urology (4 papers)Clinica Chimica Acta (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsCyprusUnited States
In The Last Decade
W.H. Doesburg
78 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Urology 197
- Clinical Biochemistry 138
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 159
- Reproductive Medicine 166
- Rheumatology 188
Countries citing papers authored by W.H. Doesburg
This map shows the geographic impact of W.H. Doesburg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.H. Doesburg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.H. Doesburg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W.H. Doesburg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.H. Doesburg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.H. Doesburg. The network helps show where W.H. Doesburg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside W.H. Doesburg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 74 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 14 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 17 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 26 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 51 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 18 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 12 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 20 | |
| 14 | 1990 | 14 | |
| 15 | 1989 | 9 | |
| 16 | 1988 | 31 | |
| 17 | 1988 | 7 | |
| 18 | 1987 | 17 | |
| 19 | 1987 | 75 | |
| 20 | 1981 | 49 |
About W.H. Doesburg
W.H. Doesburg is a scholar working on Anatomy, Urology, Reproductive Medicine, Clinical Biochemistry and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (8 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (7 papers), Dental Radiography and Imaging (7 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (6 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (6 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (5 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (5 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (197 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (138 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (159 citations), Reproductive Medicine (166 citations) and Rheumatology (188 citations). W.H. Doesburg has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Cyprus and United States. Frequent co-authors include W.A.J.G. Lemmens, Chris M.G. Thomas, K.J.B. Lamers, Chester B. Martin, J. M. van Geelen, W.O. Renier, C.P.T. Schijf, Ron A. Wevers, Ben M. Swinkels and F.M.J. Debruyne. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, The Journal of Urology, Clinica Chimica Acta, Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.