Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
How universities can enhance student mental wellbeing: the student perspective
2019282 citationsChi Baik, Wendy Larcombe et al.Higher Education Research & Developmentprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Wendy Larcombe
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Wendy Larcombe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wendy Larcombe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wendy Larcombe more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wendy Larcombe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wendy Larcombe. The network helps show where Wendy Larcombe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wendy Larcombe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wendy Larcombe.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wendy Larcombe based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Wendy Larcombe. Wendy Larcombe is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Brooker, Abi, Chi Baik, & Wendy Larcombe. (2017). Understanding Academic Educators' Work in Supporting Student Wellbeing. Minerva Access (University of Melbourne).3 indexed citations
3.
Baik, Chi, Wendy Larcombe, Johanna Wyn, et al.. (2017). Stimulating curriculum and teaching innovations to support the mental wellbeing of university students. Minerva Access (University of Melbourne).3 indexed citations
4.
Larcombe, Wendy, et al.. (2016). Who's Distressed? Not Only Law Students: Psychological Distress Level in University Students Across Diverse Fields of Study.4 indexed citations
Larcombe, Wendy, et al.. (2015). Who's Distressed? Not Only Law Students: Psychological Distress Levels in University Students Across Diverse Fields of Study. Sydney law review. 37(2). 243.23 indexed citations
7.
Larcombe, Wendy, et al.. (2015). Teaching with student wellbeing in mind..1 indexed citations
Larcombe, Wendy, et al.. (2013). Does an improved experience of law school protect students against depression, anxiety and stress?: An empirical study of wellbeing and the law school experience of LLB and JD students. Sydney law review. 35(2). 407.30 indexed citations
10.
Larcombe, Wendy & Katherine Fethers. (2013). Schooling the Blues? An Investigation of Factors Associated with Psychological Distress Among Law Students. University of New South Wales law journal. 36(2). 390.16 indexed citations
11.
Larcombe, Wendy & Mary Heath. (2012). Developing the common law and rewriting the history of rape in marriage in Australia: PGA v the queen. Sydney law review. 34(4). 785.3 indexed citations
Larcombe, Wendy. (2011). WORSNOP v THE QUEEN SUBJECTIVE BELIEF IN CONSENT PREVAILS (AGAIN) IN VICTORIA'S RAPE LAW. Melbourne University law review. 35(2). 697.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.