Wayne Proudfoot
- Sociology and Political Science
- Health top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Philosophy top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Phillip R. ShaverIrene BloomSam McFarlandSang Hyun LeeJeffrey StoutTerry F. GodlovePhilip Kitcher
- Topics
- Religion and Society Interactions (5 papers)Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers)American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers)
- Cited by
- HealthPhilosophyReligious studies
- Journals
- The Philosophical ReviewAmerican AnthropologistJournal for the Scientific Study of Religion
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Wayne Proudfoot
19 papers receiving 108 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Sociology and Political Science 101
- Health 82
- Social Psychology 36
- Philosophy 34
- Clinical Psychology 19
Countries citing papers authored by Wayne Proudfoot
This map shows the geographic impact of Wayne Proudfoot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wayne Proudfoot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wayne Proudfoot more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wayne Proudfoot
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wayne Proudfoot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wayne Proudfoot. The network helps show where Wayne Proudfoot may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wayne Proudfoot
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wayne Proudfoot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wayne Proudfoot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wayne Proudfoot. Wayne Proudfoot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | Faithful imagining : essays in honor of Richard R. Niebuhr | 3 |
| 12 | Inquiry and the language of the divine | 1 |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | Mysticism, the Numinous, and the Moral | 1 |
| 17 | God and the Self: Three Types of Philosophy of Religion | 2 |
| 18 | 92 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Rawls on the Individual and the Social | 1 |
About Wayne Proudfoot
Wayne Proudfoot is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy and Health, having authored 25 papers that have together received 159 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (5 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (82 citations), Philosophy (34 citations) and Religious studies (13 citations). Wayne Proudfoot has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Phillip R. Shaver, Irene Bloom, Sam McFarland, Sang Hyun Lee, Jeffrey Stout, Terry F. Godlove and Philip Kitcher. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, American Anthropologist and Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.