Walter M. Jay

1.8k citations
89 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 19

Walter M. Jay

84 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Walter M. Jay
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Ophthalmology 572
  • Neurology 263
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 25
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 189
  • Otorhinolaryngology 31
Replace Mark Paine with:
Mark Paine Australia
Nancy Newman United States
Arturo Carta Italy
Aylın Yaman Türkiye
Abraham Spierer Israel
Toshiyuki Okubo Japan
Elske Hoitsma Netherlands
Thomas D. Duane United States
J. Terry Ernest United States
C G Keith Australia
Walter M. Jay relative to Mark Paine Australia Mark Paine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Mark Paine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Walter M. Jay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Walter M. Jay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Walter M. Jay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Walter M. Jay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Walter M. Jay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Walter M. Jay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Walter M. Jay. The network helps show where Walter M. Jay may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Walter M. Jay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Walter M. Jay Line = papers co-authored together Walter M. Jay links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20162
2
GPS Usage in Bioptic and Non-Bioptic Low Vision Drivers
20151
3 201519
4
Characteristics of low vision patients that prefer reverse contrast settings on Closed Circuit Televisions (CCTVs) and iPads
20141
5
Usage of accessibility options for the iPhone/iPad in a visually impaired population
20144
6 20143
7 201432
8 20141
9
iPad vs Closed Circuit Television Low Vision Reading Rates and Preferences
20131
10
A Survey of Smartphone Usage in Low Vision Patients
20125
11 20117
12 20094
13 200812
14 200747
15 199421
16 19917
17 1991158
18 198941
19 198827
20 19814

About Walter M. Jay

Walter M. Jay is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Neurology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 89 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (19 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (11 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (9 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (8 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (8 papers), Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (7 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (6 papers) and Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (572 citations), Neurology (263 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (25 citations). Walter M. Jay has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kim D. Thompson, Patricia L. Davis, Rochella A. Ostrowski, Creig Hoyt, Rima M. Dafer, Michael Schneck, Thomas R. Friberg, David J. Schanzlin, Lotfi Hacein‐Bey and R K Shockley. Their work appears in journals such as Seminars in Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus and JAMA.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026