Mark Paine

2.3k total citations
33 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Mark Paine is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology and Ophthalmology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Paine has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 12 papers in Neurology and 9 papers in Ophthalmology. Recurrent topics in Mark Paine's work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (14 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (5 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (5 papers). Mark Paine is often cited by papers focused on Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (14 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (5 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (5 papers). Mark Paine collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Ireland. Mark Paine's co-authors include Justin O’Day, Alexander Klistorner, Jessica Vitkovic, Stuart L. Graham, Hemamalini Arvind, Con Yiannikas, Raymond Garrick, Gary Rance, John Grigg and Colin Chan and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, NeuroImage and Stroke.

In The Last Decade

Mark Paine

33 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Paine Australia 19 443 443 257 182 144 33 1.1k
Deborah Mason New Zealand 15 601 1.4× 210 0.5× 290 1.1× 73 0.4× 93 0.6× 29 1.0k
Walter M. Jay United States 19 189 0.4× 572 1.3× 263 1.0× 54 0.3× 142 1.0× 89 1.2k
Edward Margolin Canada 15 134 0.3× 363 0.8× 408 1.6× 43 0.2× 98 0.7× 176 922
Veit Sturm Switzerland 18 225 0.5× 589 1.3× 179 0.7× 122 0.7× 373 2.6× 63 1.0k
Carmel Noonan United Kingdom 18 465 1.0× 315 0.7× 280 1.1× 50 0.3× 118 0.8× 44 982
Joachim Esser Germany 19 737 1.7× 356 0.8× 195 0.8× 77 0.4× 66 0.5× 39 1.3k
John W. Gittinger United States 16 133 0.3× 269 0.6× 214 0.8× 37 0.2× 50 0.3× 62 655
C S Hoyt United States 18 180 0.4× 420 0.9× 169 0.7× 59 0.3× 398 2.8× 27 1.3k
Stacy L. Pineles United States 29 968 2.2× 1.3k 3.0× 701 2.7× 105 0.6× 673 4.7× 161 2.5k
L. Morgante United States 10 417 0.9× 96 0.2× 186 0.7× 28 0.2× 55 0.4× 12 702

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Paine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Paine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Paine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Paine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Paine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Paine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Paine. The network helps show where Mark Paine may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Paine

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Paine. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Paine based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Paine. Mark Paine is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lust, Karin, et al.. (2021). Management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension in pregnancy. Obstetric Medicine. 15(3). 160–167. 6 indexed citations
2.
Grech, Lisa, et al.. (2018). Importance of Coping in the Relationship Between Executive Function and Quality of Life in People with Multiple Sclerosis. International Journal of MS Care. 21(5). 201–206. 5 indexed citations
3.
Grech, Lisa, et al.. (2015). The effect of executive function on stress, depression, anxiety, and quality of life in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 37(5). 549–562. 27 indexed citations
4.
Grech, Lisa, et al.. (2015). Coping mediates and moderates the relationship between executive functions and psychological adjustment in multiple sclerosis.. Neuropsychology. 30(3). 361–376. 27 indexed citations
5.
Vitkovic, Jessica, et al.. (2013). Vestibular rehabilitation outcomes in patients with and without vestibular migraine. Journal of Neurology. 260(12). 3039–3048. 54 indexed citations
6.
Walt, Anneke van der, Scott Kolbe, Neil Shuey, et al.. (2012). The temporal profile of optic nerve DTI measures and RNFL thickness in the first year after acute optic neuritis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 18(5). 700–700. 1 indexed citations
7.
Kolbe, Scott, Caron Chapman, Tan Nguyen, et al.. (2011). Diffusion tensor imaging of the optic radiations after optic neuritis. Human Brain Mapping. 33(9). 2047–2061. 39 indexed citations
8.
Chen, Celia S., Andrew W. Lee, Bruce Campbell, et al.. (2011). Study of the Efficacy of Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Central Retinal Artery Occlusion. International Journal of Stroke. 6(1). 87–89. 9 indexed citations
9.
Klistorner, Alexander, R. Garrick, Mark Paine, et al.. (2011). Relationship between chronic demyelination of the optic nerve and short term axonal loss. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 83(3). 311–314. 13 indexed citations
10.
Kolbe, Scott, Caron Chapman, Thanh Nguyen, et al.. (2009). Optic nerve diffusion changes and atrophy jointly predict visual dysfunction after optic neuritis. NeuroImage. 45(3). 679–686. 79 indexed citations
11.
Enticott, Joanne, Jessica Vitkovic, Brian Holden Reid, Paul O’Neill, & Mark Paine. (2007). Vestibular Rehabilitation in Individuals with Inner-Ear Dysfunction: A Pilot Study. Audiology and Neurotology. 13(1). 19–28. 21 indexed citations
12.
Vitkovic, Jessica, Mark Paine, & Gary Rance. (2007). Neuro-Otological Findings in Patients with Migraine- and Nonmigraine-Related Dizziness. Audiology and Neurotology. 13(2). 113–122. 50 indexed citations
13.
Mouly, Stéphane, Christopher Matheny, Mark Paine, et al.. (2005). Variation in oral clearance of saquinavir is predicted by CYP3A5*1 genotype but not by enterocyte content of cytochrome P450 3A5. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 78(6). 605–618. 73 indexed citations
14.
Paine, Mark. (2005). Dealing with dizziness. Australian Prescriber. 28(4). 94–97. 2 indexed citations
15.
Paine, Mark, et al.. (2003). Immunotherapy of Ocular Myasthenia Gravis Reduces Conversion to Generalized Myasthenia Gravis. Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology. 23(4). 251–255. 74 indexed citations
16.
Paine, Mark, et al.. (2002). Retinal manifestations of ophthalmic artery hypoperfusion. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 30(4). 284–291. 7 indexed citations
17.
Castiello, Umberto, Mark Paine, & Roger Wales. (2002). Perceiving an entire object and grasping only half of it. Neuropsychologia. 40(2). 145–151. 3 indexed citations
18.
Chan, Colin, Mark Paine, & Justin O’Day. (2001). Carotid dissection: a common cause of Horner's syndrome. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 29(6). 411–415. 49 indexed citations
19.
Saw, Valerie, Catherine Green, Robert Briggs, et al.. (2000). Susac syndrome: Microangiopathy of the retina, cochlea and brain. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 28(5). 373–381. 52 indexed citations
20.
Paine, Mark, Stephen M. Davis, & Graham Brown. (1994). Severe forms of infection with Angiostrongylus cantonensis acquired in Australia and Fiji*. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine. 24(4). 415–416. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026