Mark Paine
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Retinal and Optic Conditions 5
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 4
-
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies 14
- Neurology top 5%
- Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis 5
- Vestibular and auditory disorders 5
- Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders 4
- Neurology top 5%
- Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis 5
- Vestibular and auditory disorders 5
- Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders 4
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
-
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research 5
-
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics 3
- Co-authors
- Justin O’DayAlexander KlistornerJessica VitkovicHemamalini ArvindStuart L. GrahamCon YiannikasRaymond GarrickJohn Grigg
- Journals
- Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (3 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)International Journal of MS Care (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomIreland
In The Last Decade
Mark Paine
33 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Ophthalmology 443
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 443
- Neurology 182
- Neurology 257
- Psychiatry and Mental health 114
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Paine
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Paine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Paine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Paine more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Paine
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Paine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Paine. The network helps show where Mark Paine may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Paine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 54 | |
| 6 | The temporal profile of optic nerve DTI measures and RNFL thickness in the first year after acute optic neuritis | 2012 | 1 |
| 7 | 2011 | 39 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 79 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 50 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 21 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 73 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 19 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 74 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 49 | |
| 19 | 2000 | 52 | |
| 20 | 1994 | 4 |
About Mark Paine
Mark Paine is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Sensory Systems and Neurology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (14 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (5 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (5 papers), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (5 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (5 papers), Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (443 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (443 citations) and Neurology (182 citations). Mark Paine has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Justin O’Day, Alexander Klistorner, Jessica Vitkovic, Hemamalini Arvind, Stuart L. Graham, Con Yiannikas, Raymond Garrick, John Grigg, Gary Rance and Colin Chan. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, PLoS ONE, International Journal of MS Care, Multiple Sclerosis Journal and Audiology and Neurotology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.