Walter J. Hipple
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 5%
- Museology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Edmund BurkeJames T. BoultonAlexander SesonskeRobert RosenblumFrancis HutchesonPeter KivySamuel Holt MonkW. L. Hogarth
- Topics
- Historical Art and Culture Studies (9 papers)Architecture and Art History Studies (2 papers)Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper)
- Journals
- The Philosophical QuarterlyJournal of Aesthetics and Art CriticismThe William and Mary Quarterly
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Walter J. Hipple
17 papers receiving 193 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Literature and Literary Theory 41
- Philosophy 41
- Sociology and Political Science 39
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 35
- Museology 33
Countries citing papers authored by Walter J. Hipple
This map shows the geographic impact of Walter J. Hipple's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Walter J. Hipple with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Walter J. Hipple more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Walter J. Hipple
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Walter J. Hipple. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Walter J. Hipple. The network helps show where Walter J. Hipple may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Walter J. Hipple
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Walter J. Hipple. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Walter J. Hipple based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Walter J. Hipple. Walter J. Hipple is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 29 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 94 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | The beautiful, the sublime, & the picturesque in eigtheenth-century British aesthetic theory | 1 |
| 17 | The Beautiful, the Sublime, & the Picturesque: In Eighteenth-Century British Aesthetic Theory | 47 |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Walter J. Hipple
Walter J. Hipple is a scholar working on Museology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Art and Culture Studies (9 papers), Architecture and Art History Studies (2 papers) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Museology (33 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (35 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (18 citations). Walter J. Hipple has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Edmund Burke, James T. Boulton, Alexander Sesonske, Robert Rosenblum, Francis Hutcheson, Peter Kivy, Samuel Holt Monk, W. L. Hogarth, Joshua Reynolds and David J. Irwin. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism and The William and Mary Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.