Wallace K. Ferguson
- History top 1%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Classics top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Lauro MartinesElio GianturcoMillard MeissEdmond JacobHans BaronGary PotterRobert M. KingdonFrederick B. Artz
- Topics
- Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (8 papers)Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (5 papers)Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- Canada
In The Last Decade
Wallace K. Ferguson
23 papers receiving 160 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- History 142
- Political Science and International Relations 63
- Classics 49
- Sociology and Political Science 37
- Economics and Econometrics 32
Countries citing papers authored by Wallace K. Ferguson
This map shows the geographic impact of Wallace K. Ferguson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wallace K. Ferguson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wallace K. Ferguson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wallace K. Ferguson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wallace K. Ferguson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wallace K. Ferguson. The network helps show where Wallace K. Ferguson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wallace K. Ferguson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wallace K. Ferguson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wallace K. Ferguson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wallace K. Ferguson. Wallace K. Ferguson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Facets of the Renaissance | 2 |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 36 | |
| 5 | Facets of the Renaissance : essays | 1 |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | The Renaissance : six essays | 10 |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | Desiderii Erasmi Roterodami Opera omnia, emendatiora et auctiora, ad optimas editiones, praecipue quas ipse Erasmus postremo curavit, summa fide exacta, doctorumque virorum notis illustrata : Recognovit Joannes Clericus | 0 |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 46 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 42 | |
| 19 | 31 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Wallace K. Ferguson
Wallace K. Ferguson is a scholar working on History, Classics and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 273 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (8 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (5 papers) and Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (49 citations), History (142 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (14 citations). Wallace K. Ferguson has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Lauro Martines, Elio Gianturco, Millard Meiss, Edmond Jacob, Hans Baron, Gary Potter, Robert M. Kingdon, Frederick B. Artz, W. H. Werkmeister and Desiderius Erasmus. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Political Science Quarterly and The Art Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.