W.A. Nolen
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jan SpijkerAartjan T.F. BeekmanR. de GraafFlorian HardeveldJohan OrmelRob BijlTom K. BirkenhägerP. Moleman
- Topics
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (15 papers)Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (5 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesSweden
In The Last Decade
W.A. Nolen
33 papers receiving 812 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Psychiatry and Mental health 297
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 233
- Pharmacology 209
- Clinical Psychology 207
- Social Psychology 199
Countries citing papers authored by W.A. Nolen
This map shows the geographic impact of W.A. Nolen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.A. Nolen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.A. Nolen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W.A. Nolen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.A. Nolen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.A. Nolen. The network helps show where W.A. Nolen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W.A. Nolen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W.A. Nolen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W.A. Nolen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W.A. Nolen. W.A. Nolen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | |
| 2 | Mixed Depression in the Stanley Foundation Bipolar Treatment Network: Prevalence Rate and Clinical Correlates During Naturalistic Follow Up | 2 |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | [Diagnosis and treatment of bipolar disorder in children]. | 1 |
| 7 | 57 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | Duration of depressive episodes and determinants of the future course of the illness | 1 |
| 12 | 125 | |
| 13 | [Undertreatment of depression; causes and recommendations]. | 14 |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 54 |
About W.A. Nolen
W.A. Nolen is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Biological Psychiatry and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 851 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (15 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (5 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (106 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (297 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (233 citations). W.A. Nolen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Jan Spijker, Aartjan T.F. Beekman, R. de Graaf, Florian Hardeveld, Johan Ormel, Rob Bijl, Tom K. Birkenhäger, P. Moleman, Ron de Graaf and Eline J. Regeer. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Psychological Medicine and Journal of Affective Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.