W.A. Brandenburg

2.2k total citations
53 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

W.A. Brandenburg is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, W.A. Brandenburg has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Plant Science, 11 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 8 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in W.A. Brandenburg's work include Botanical Research and Chemistry (7 papers), Botanical Studies and Applications (7 papers) and Algal biology and biofuel production (6 papers). W.A. Brandenburg is often cited by papers focused on Botanical Research and Chemistry (7 papers), Botanical Studies and Applications (7 papers) and Algal biology and biofuel production (6 papers). W.A. Brandenburg collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Denmark. W.A. Brandenburg's co-authors include René H. Wijffels, Dorinde M.M. Kleinegris, Marcel Janssen, W.J. Corré, R.E.E. Jongschaap, H. van Keulen, W. de Visser, Ana M. López‐Contreras, R.R.C. Bakker and B.L.H.M. Sperber and has published in prestigious journals such as Bioresource Technology, Biotechnology Advances and Enzyme and Microbial Technology.

In The Last Decade

W.A. Brandenburg

46 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
W.A. Brandenburg Netherlands	19	399	393	390	376	271	53	1.5k
Sergio O. Lourenço Brazil	15	1.0k 2.6×	389 1.0×	154 0.4×	710 1.9×	227 0.8×	23	1.9k
Elisabete Barbarino Brazil	16	995 2.5×	375 1.0×	158 0.4×	734 2.0×	229 0.8×	29	1.9k
Dinabandhu Sahoo India	29	488 1.2×	812 2.1×	786 2.0×	489 1.3×	348 1.3×	104	3.0k
Céline Rebours Norway	20	613 1.5×	337 0.9×	156 0.4×	827 2.2×	111 0.4×	39	1.9k
Stefan Kraan Ireland	17	573 1.4×	487 1.2×	321 0.8×	1.7k 4.5×	134 0.5×	31	2.4k
Juan Luis Gómez‐Pinchetti Spain	19	565 1.4×	212 0.5×	143 0.4×	592 1.6×	52 0.2×	50	1.5k
Eliane Marinho‐Soriano Brazil	21	434 1.1×	212 0.5×	215 0.6×	1.1k 2.9×	93 0.3×	53	2.0k
Vaibhav A. Mantri India	22	367 0.9×	222 0.6×	243 0.6×	908 2.4×	70 0.3×	85	1.6k
Gabriella Di Lena Italy	20	133 0.3×	284 0.7×	165 0.4×	611 1.6×	83 0.3×	39	1.5k
João Cotas Portugal	25	533 1.3×	558 1.4×	452 1.2×	1.6k 4.2×	88 0.3×	64	2.4k

Countries citing papers authored by W.A. Brandenburg

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W.A. Brandenburg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.A. Brandenburg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.A. Brandenburg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W.A. Brandenburg

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.A. Brandenburg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.A. Brandenburg. The network helps show where W.A. Brandenburg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W.A. Brandenburg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W.A. Brandenburg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W.A. Brandenburg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W.A. Brandenburg. W.A. Brandenburg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Thomas, Jean-Baptiste, et al.. (2017). Explorative environmental life cycle assessment for system design of seaweed cultivation and drying. Algal Research. 27. 43–54. 68 indexed citations

Burg, S.W.K. van den, M. Stuiver, P. Bikker, et al.. (2013). A Triple P review of the feasibility of sustainable offshore seaweed production in the North Sea. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 31 indexed citations

Kleinegris, Dorinde M.M., Marcel Janssen, W.A. Brandenburg, & René H. Wijffels. (2011). Two-phase systems: Potential for in situ extraction of microalgal products. Biotechnology Advances. 29(5). 502–507. 39 indexed citations

Kleinegris, Dorinde M.M., Marcel Janssen, W.A. Brandenburg, & René H. Wijffels. (2010). Continuous production of carotenoids from Dunaliella salina. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 48(3). 253–259. 55 indexed citations

Haubenhofer, D.K., et al.. (2010). Green Care as opportunity for knowledge systems, learning and collective action across Europe. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 315–320. 2 indexed citations

Kleinegris, Dorinde M.M., et al.. (2010). Phase toxicity of dodecane on the microalga Dunaliella salina. Journal of Applied Phycology. 23(6). 949–958. 31 indexed citations

Kleinegris, Dorinde M.M., Marcel Janssen, W.A. Brandenburg, & René H. Wijffels. (2009). The Selectivity of Milking of Dunaliella salina. Marine Biotechnology. 12(1). 14–23. 41 indexed citations

Brandenburg, W.A., et al.. (2006). Platform Groene grondstoffen, werkgroep 1: duurzame productie en ontwikkeling van biomassa, deelpad: Aquatische biomassa. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 2 indexed citations

Tramper, J., Chris Battershill, W.A. Brandenburg, et al.. (2003). What to do in marine biotechnology?. Biomolecular Engineering. 20(4-6). 467–471. 25 indexed citations

10.

Louwaars, N.P., W.A. Brandenburg, L. J. W. Gilissen, G.A. Kleter, & Jaap A. Wagenaar. (2002). The Biosafety Files, a new link in biosafety information. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 13–14. 3 indexed citations

11.

Brandenburg, W.A., et al.. (2001). Lectotypification and description of Clematis viticella L. (Ranunculaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 135(1). 13–23. 1 indexed citations

12.

Berg, R.G. van den, et al.. (1999). Cultonomy in statutory registration exemplified by Allium L. crops. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 12(3). 149–160. 2 indexed citations

13.

Beest, Mariska te, R.G. van den Berg, & W.A. Brandenburg. (1999). A taxonomic analysis of the species of Physalis L. (Solanaceae) based on morphological characters. 85–97. 3 indexed citations

14.

Lange, W., et al.. (1999). Taxonomy and cultonomy of beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 130(1). 81–96. 72 indexed citations

15.

Hetterscheid, W.L.A. & W.A. Brandenburg. (1995). THE CULTON CONCEPT: SETTING THE STAGE FOR AN UNAMBIGUOUS TAXONOMY OF CULTIVATED PLANTS. Acta Horticulturae. 29–34. 4 indexed citations

16.

Brandenburg, W.A., A. van der Neut, & Charles E. Jarvis. (1987). LECTOTYPIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION OF CLEMATIS ORIENTALIS L. (RANUNCULACEAE). Taxon. 36(1). 117–126. 1 indexed citations

17.

Brandenburg, W.A.. (1986). Classification of cultivated Clematis.. Horticultural Science. 21(3). 120–120. 1 indexed citations

18.

Brandenburg, W.A.. (1984). The implications of the use of common plant names. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 124(20). 37–40. 1 indexed citations

19.

Brandenburg, W.A.. (1983). Taxonomy of cultivated plants with regard to breeding value of the accessions. Genetika. 15(3). 325–335. 5 indexed citations

20.

Brandenburg, W.A.. (1981). Possible relationships between wild and cultivated carrots (Daucus carota L.) in the Netherlands. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 29(1). 369–375. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact