W. W. Cantelo

1.0k citations
68 papers · 784 indexed · h-index 15

W. W. Cantelo

65 papers receiving 662 citations

Peers

W. W. Cantelo
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Insect Science 523
  • Plant Science 422
  • Molecular Biology 187
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 168
  • Food Science 130
Replace H. Young with:
H. Young New Zealand
D. S. Moreno United States
L. M. McDonough United States
Tirtza Zahavi Israel
C. E. Peterson United States
Sandra Vacas Spain
B. E. Mazomenos Greece
F. Mansour Israel
Arlindo Leal Boiça Júnior Brazil
Xiangzhen Zhu China
W. W. Cantelo relative to H. Young New Zealand H. Young's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
H. Young · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. W. Cantelo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. W. Cantelo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. W. Cantelo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. W. Cantelo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. W. Cantelo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. W. Cantelo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. W. Cantelo. The network helps show where W. W. Cantelo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. W. Cantelo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. W. Cantelo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. W. Cantelo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. W. Cantelo. W. W. Cantelo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 0
3 32
4
Comparative efficacy of a blacklight trap and a Robinson trap in trapping moths.
4
5 28
6
Effect of Beauveria bassiana on underground stages of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).
10
7 4
8
Control of the Colorado Potato Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on Tomatoes with Bacillus Thuringiensis Var. Thuringiensis
1
9 8
10 11
11
Moth trap performance: Jackson trap vs Texas pheromone trap Heliothis zea, Heliothis virescens
1
12 4
13 52
14 93
15 8
16 12
17 1
18 2
19 0
20 1

About W. W. Cantelo

W. W. Cantelo is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 68 papers that have together received 784 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Pest Control Strategies (34 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (24 papers) and Insect Resistance and Genetics (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (523 citations), Plant Science (422 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (168 citations). W. W. Cantelo has collaborated with scholars based in United States and U.S. Virgin Islands. Frequent co-authors include Martin Jacobson, L. L. Sanford, S. L. Sinden, Kenneth L. Deahl, George E. Cantwell, Robert J. Argauer, W. R. Nickle, Jeffrey R. Aldrich, Peter A. Follett and George Roderick. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Theoretical and Applied Genetics and Journal of Chemical Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026