W. Schroers

2.5k total citations
51 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

W. Schroers is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Condensed Matter Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, W. Schroers has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 49 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 6 papers in Condensed Matter Physics and 2 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in W. Schroers's work include Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (49 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (46 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (40 papers). W. Schroers is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (49 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (46 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (40 papers). W. Schroers collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. W. Schroers's co-authors include John Negele, Ph. Hägler, Dru B. Renner, Robert G. Edwards, David Richards, Kostas Orginos, Andrew Pochinsky, Klaus Schilling, Thomas Lippert and George Fleming and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics Letters B and Nuclear Physics A.

In The Last Decade

W. Schroers

49 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
W. Schroers Germany 21 1.8k 58 54 25 15 51 1.8k
Ph. Hägler Germany 25 2.1k 1.2× 30 0.5× 71 1.3× 27 1.1× 17 1.1× 55 2.1k
Dru B. Renner United States 16 1.5k 0.8× 45 0.8× 52 1.0× 16 0.6× 7 0.5× 55 1.5k
M. Savcı Türkiye 25 1.7k 0.9× 41 0.7× 38 0.7× 24 1.0× 21 1.4× 131 1.7k
A. Ali Khan Japan 17 1.2k 0.7× 92 1.6× 50 0.9× 36 1.4× 7 0.5× 52 1.2k
J. B. Zhang Australia 12 682 0.4× 67 1.2× 45 0.8× 20 0.8× 9 0.6× 15 697
Bernhard Musch Germany 13 1.2k 0.7× 13 0.2× 40 0.7× 23 0.9× 10 0.7× 35 1.2k
P. V. Pobylitsa Russia 21 1.5k 0.9× 36 0.6× 59 1.1× 33 1.3× 5 0.3× 33 1.6k
L. Ya. Glozman Austria 16 641 0.4× 34 0.6× 62 1.1× 22 0.9× 11 0.7× 46 653
S. Wright United States 14 751 0.4× 31 0.5× 56 1.0× 42 1.7× 9 0.6× 20 789
L. J. Reinders United Kingdom 20 2.2k 1.2× 47 0.8× 56 1.0× 19 0.8× 5 0.3× 32 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by W. Schroers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Schroers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Schroers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Schroers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Schroers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Schroers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Schroers. The network helps show where W. Schroers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. Schroers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. Schroers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. Schroers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. Schroers. W. Schroers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bratt, Jonathan, Robert G. Edwards, Ph. Hägler, et al.. (2010). Nucleon structure from mixed action calculations using 2+1 flavors of asqtad sea and domain wall valence fermions. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). 26 indexed citations
2.
Walker-Loud, André, Huey-Wen Lin, David Richards, et al.. (2009). Light hadron spectroscopy using domain wall valence quarks on an asqtad sea. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 79(5). 134 indexed citations
3.
Brömmel, Dirk, M. Göckeler, R. Horsley, et al.. (2008). Hadronic structure from the lattice. The European Physical Journal Special Topics. 162(1). 63–71. 4 indexed citations
4.
Schroers, W.. (2007). Understanding nucleon structure using lattice simulations - Recent progress on three different structural observables. arXiv (Cornell University). 31(4). 784–786. 1 indexed citations
5.
Pleiter, D., R. Horsley, Y. Nakamura, et al.. (2007). Probing the chiral limit with clover fermions. II. The Baryon sector. 129. 1 indexed citations
6.
Edwards, Robert G., George Fleming, Ph. Hägler, et al.. (2006). Nucleon Axial Charge in Full Lattice QCD. Physical Review Letters. 96(5). 52001–52001. 110 indexed citations
7.
Schroers, W.. (2006). What the lattice can tell us about nucleon structure. Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements. 153(1). 277–282. 2 indexed citations
8.
Edwards, Robert G., George Fleming, Ph. Hägler, et al.. (2005). Understanding hadron structure from lattice QCD in the SciDAC era. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 16. 150–159. 2 indexed citations
9.
Alexandrou, Constantia, Ph. de Forcrand, H. Neff, et al.. (2005). N-to-ΔElectromagnetic-Transition Form Factors from Lattice QCD. Physical Review Letters. 94(2). 21601–21601. 60 indexed citations
10.
Alexandrou, Constantia, Robert G. Edwards, Philippe de Forcrand, et al.. (2005). First principles calculations of nucleon and pion form factors: understanding the building blocks of nuclear matter from lattice QCD. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 16. 174–178. 4 indexed citations
11.
Pleiter, D., M. Göckeler, R. Horsley, et al.. (2005). Meson decay constants from Nf=2 clover fermions. 63–63. 2 indexed citations
12.
Schroers, W.. (2005). Parton distributions from the lattice. Nuclear Physics A. 755. 333–336. 8 indexed citations
13.
Alexandrou, Constantia, Ph. de Forcrand, H. Neff, et al.. (2005). Momentum dependence of the N to Δ transition form factors. Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements. 140. 293–295. 3 indexed citations
14.
Göckeler, M., R. Horsley, D. Pleiter, et al.. (2004). Generalized Parton Distributions from Lattice QCD. Physical Review Letters. 92(4). 42002–42002. 140 indexed citations
15.
Hägler, Ph., John Negele, Dru B. Renner, et al.. (2004). Transverse Structure of Nucleon Parton Distributions from Lattice QCD. Physical Review Letters. 93(11). 112001–112001. 53 indexed citations
16.
Alexandrou, Constantia, Ph. de Forcrand, Thomas Lippert, et al.. (2004). NtoΔelectromagnetic transition form factors from lattice QCD. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 69(11). 33 indexed citations
17.
Bakulev, A. P., K. Passek-Kumerički, W. Schroers, & N. G. Stefanis. (2004). Pion form factor in QCD: From nonlocal condensates to next-to-leading-order analytic perturbation theory. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 70(3). 81 indexed citations
18.
Hägler, Ph., John Negele, Dru B. Renner, et al.. (2003). Moments of nucleon generalized parton distributions in lattice QCD. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 68(3). 165 indexed citations
19.
Farchioni, F., et al.. (2002). QCD spectroscopy with three light quarks. Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements. 106-107. 215–217. 3 indexed citations
20.
Lippert, Thomas, et al.. (2001). Instanton dominance of topological charge fluctuations in QCD?. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 65(1). 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026