W. S. Lewis

2.6k total citations
26 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

W. S. Lewis is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology and Oceanography. According to data from OpenAlex, W. S. Lewis has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 7 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Oceanography. Recurrent topics in W. S. Lewis's work include Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (19 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (19 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (16 papers). W. S. Lewis is often cited by papers focused on Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (19 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (19 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (16 papers). W. S. Lewis collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. W. S. Lewis's co-authors include S. A. Fuselier, D. J. McComas, J. L. Burch, S. M. Petrinec, J. H. Waite, N. A. Schwadron, K. J. Trattner, R. E. Ergun, G. R. Gladstone and C. Schiff and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres.

In The Last Decade

W. S. Lewis

25 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
W. S. Lewis United States 19 1.1k 339 120 119 57 26 1.2k
J. A. Sauvaud France 23 1.2k 1.1× 334 1.0× 226 1.9× 86 0.7× 48 0.8× 56 1.3k
Anna Milillo Italy 26 1.6k 1.4× 240 0.7× 108 0.9× 183 1.5× 42 0.7× 95 1.6k
R. Schwenn Germany 15 2.2k 1.9× 702 2.1× 107 0.9× 118 1.0× 79 1.4× 37 2.2k
Romain Maggiolo Belgium 18 983 0.9× 326 1.0× 255 2.1× 91 0.8× 48 0.8× 45 1.0k
E. Keppler Germany 18 1.2k 1.1× 290 0.9× 173 1.4× 81 0.7× 60 1.1× 94 1.3k
N. J. T. Edberg Sweden 26 1.9k 1.7× 328 1.0× 37 0.3× 148 1.2× 147 2.6× 81 1.9k
Gabriella Stenberg Wieser Sweden 26 1.7k 1.5× 307 0.9× 86 0.7× 78 0.7× 78 1.4× 97 1.7k
H. U. Schmidt Germany 16 1.5k 1.3× 255 0.8× 61 0.5× 84 0.7× 109 1.9× 61 1.5k
A. J. Steffl United States 20 1.3k 1.2× 248 0.7× 47 0.4× 138 1.2× 50 0.9× 66 1.4k
R. J. Oliversen United States 13 1.5k 1.3× 412 1.2× 37 0.3× 83 0.7× 61 1.1× 52 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by W. S. Lewis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. S. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. S. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. S. Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. S. Lewis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. S. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. S. Lewis. The network helps show where W. S. Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. S. Lewis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. S. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. S. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. S. Lewis. W. S. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Trattner, K. J., J. L. Burch, R. E. Ergun, et al.. (2017). The MMS Dayside Magnetic Reconnection Locations During Phase 1 and Their Relation to the Predictions of the Maximum Magnetic Shear Model. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 122(12). 35 indexed citations
2.
Fuselier, S. A., J. L. Burch, P. A. Cassak, et al.. (2016). Magnetospheric ion influence on magnetic reconnection at the duskside magnetopause. Geophysical Research Letters. 43(4). 1435–1442. 35 indexed citations
3.
Petrinec, S. M., J. L. Burch, S. A. Fuselier, et al.. (2016). Comparison of Magnetospheric Multiscale ion jet signatures with predicted reconnection site locations at the magnetopause. Geophysical Research Letters. 43(12). 5997–6004. 19 indexed citations
4.
Fuselier, S. A., W. S. Lewis, C. Schiff, et al.. (2014). Magnetospheric Multiscale Science Mission Profile and Operations. Space Science Reviews. 199(1-4). 77–103. 114 indexed citations
5.
Fuselier, S. A., R. A. Frahm, W. S. Lewis, et al.. (2014). The location of magnetic reconnection at Saturn's magnetopause: A comparison with Earth. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 119(4). 2563–2578. 51 indexed citations
6.
McComas, D. J., H. O. Funsten, S. A. Fuselier, et al.. (2011). IBEX observations of heliospheric energetic neutral atoms: Current understanding and future directions. Geophysical Research Letters. 38(18). n/a–n/a. 52 indexed citations
7.
Burch, J. L., J. Goldstein, P. Mokashi, et al.. (2008). On the cause of Saturn's plasma periodicity. Geophysical Research Letters. 35(14). 25 indexed citations
8.
Burch, J. L., J. Goldstein, W. S. Lewis, et al.. (2007). Tethys and Dione as sources of outward-flowing plasma in Saturn’s magnetosphere. Nature. 447(7146). 833–835. 43 indexed citations
9.
McComas, D. J., M. Velli, W. S. Lewis, et al.. (2007). Understanding coronal heating and solar wind acceleration: Case for in situ near‐Sun measurements. Reviews of Geophysics. 45(1). 62 indexed citations
10.
Borg, A., Nikolai Østgaard, A. Pedersen, et al.. (2007). Simultaneous observations of magnetotail reconnection and bright X‐ray aurora on 2 October 2002. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 112(A6). 13 indexed citations
11.
Winglee, R. M., W. S. Lewis, & G. Lu. (2005). Mapping of the heavy ion outflows as seen by IMAGE and multifluid global modeling for the 17 April 2002 storm. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 110(A12). 26 indexed citations
12.
Waite, J. H., W. S. Lewis, W. T. Kasprzak, et al.. (2004). The Cassini Ion and Neutral Mass Spectrometer (INMS) Investigation. Space Science Reviews. 114(1-4). 113–231. 173 indexed citations
13.
Burch, J. L., W. S. Lewis, T. J. Immel, et al.. (2002). Interplanetary magnetic field control of afternoon‐sector detached proton auroral arcs. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 107(A9). 46 indexed citations
14.
Gladstone, G. R., J. H. Waite, Denis Grodent, et al.. (2002). A pulsating auroral X-ray hot spot on Jupiter. Nature. 415(6875). 1000–1003. 132 indexed citations
15.
Lewis, W. S., R. Goldstein, D. J. McComas, et al.. (2001). An auroral flare at Jupiter. Nature. 410(6830). 787–789. 95 indexed citations
16.
Fuselier, S. A., J. L. Burch, W. S. Lewis, & P. H. Reiff. (2000). Overview of the image science objectives and mission phases. Space Science Reviews. 91(1-2). 51–66. 7 indexed citations
17.
Waite, J. H., G. R. Gladstone, W. S. Lewis, et al.. (1997). Equatorial X-ray Emissions: Implications for Jupiter's High Exospheric Temperatures. Science. 276(5309). 104–108. 70 indexed citations
18.
Waite, J. H., G. R. Gladstone, W. S. Lewis, et al.. (1996). The Physical Basis for a Jovian Thermospheric GCM. DPS.
19.
Waite, J. H., W. S. Lewis, G. R. Gladstone, A. C. Fabian, & W. N. Brandt. (1996). Jovian X-ray emissions.. 641–644. 2 indexed citations
20.
Waite, J. H., G. R. Gladstone, W. S. Lewis, et al.. (1995). ROSAT Observations of X-ray Emissions from Jupiter During the Impact of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9. Science. 268(5217). 1598–1601. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026