C. Schiff

1.2k total citations
31 papers, 421 citations indexed

About

C. Schiff is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Aerospace Engineering and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, C. Schiff has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 421 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 13 papers in Aerospace Engineering and 5 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in C. Schiff's work include Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (16 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (16 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (14 papers). C. Schiff is often cited by papers focused on Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (16 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (16 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (14 papers). C. Schiff collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. C. Schiff's co-authors include J. L. Burch, R. E. Ergun, S. A. Fuselier, S. M. Petrinec, K. J. Trattner, W. S. Lewis, D. J. Gershman, B. L. Giles, L. A. Avanov and J. Dorelli and has published in prestigious journals such as Geophysical Research Letters, Nature Physics and Physics of Plasmas.

In The Last Decade

C. Schiff

29 papers receiving 407 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. Schiff United States 11 389 129 94 88 24 31 421
Artem Smirnov Germany 10 295 0.8× 87 0.7× 70 0.7× 159 1.8× 19 0.8× 34 334
M. K. James United Kingdom 12 348 0.9× 149 1.2× 28 0.3× 95 1.1× 17 0.7× 26 393
G. Ya. Smolkov Russia 10 367 0.9× 112 0.9× 108 1.1× 112 1.3× 12 0.5× 30 409
S. Marple United Kingdom 11 358 0.9× 82 0.6× 54 0.6× 142 1.6× 73 3.0× 25 388
K. H. Fornacon Germany 11 459 1.2× 217 1.7× 66 0.7× 157 1.8× 19 0.8× 24 518
G. G. Vertogradov Russia 10 298 0.8× 79 0.6× 98 1.0× 242 2.8× 15 0.6× 46 335
G. Cheney United States 4 352 0.9× 71 0.6× 170 1.8× 153 1.7× 31 1.3× 5 381
E. Penou France 11 520 1.3× 144 1.1× 19 0.2× 133 1.5× 30 1.3× 27 550
J. L. Bougeret France 13 542 1.4× 89 0.7× 32 0.3× 55 0.6× 16 0.7× 26 564
P. Tříska Slovakia 9 262 0.7× 81 0.6× 39 0.4× 171 1.9× 9 0.4× 58 323

Countries citing papers authored by C. Schiff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Schiff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Schiff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Schiff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Schiff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Schiff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Schiff. The network helps show where C. Schiff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Schiff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Schiff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Schiff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Schiff. C. Schiff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Albert, Christine M., C. Schiff, Andrea Pirone, et al.. (2025). Building hybrid models of neuromodulation from automatic segmentation of peripheral nerve histological sections. Computers in Biology and Medicine. 197(Pt B). 111072–111072.
2.
Murphy, K. R., et al.. (2024). Target and science visibility of the solar-terrestrial observer for the response of the magnetosphere (STORM) global imaging mission concept. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences. 11. 1 indexed citations
3.
Burkholder, Brandon, Li‐Jen Chen, S. A. Fuselier, et al.. (2022). MMS Observations of Storm‐Time Magnetopause Boundary Layers in the Vicinity of the Southern Cusp. Geophysical Research Letters. 49(24). 1 indexed citations
4.
Gershman, D. J., A. C. Barrie, S. R. Elkington, et al.. (2021). Three Solar Irradiance Proxies for Aperture Photoelectron Detections in Top‐Hat ESAs Coated With Ebonol‐C. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 126(12). 1 indexed citations
5.
Barrie, A. C., et al.. (2021). Calibrating Electrostatic Deflection of Charged Particle Sensors Using Ambient Plasma Measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 126(7). e2021JA029149–e2021JA029149. 2 indexed citations
6.
Gershman, D. J., J. Dorelli, L. A. Avanov, et al.. (2019). Systematic Uncertainties in Plasma Parameters Reported by the Fast Plasma Investigation on NASA's Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 124(12). 10345–10359. 20 indexed citations
7.
Barrie, A. C., F. Cipriani, C. P. Escoubet, et al.. (2019). Characterizing spacecraft potential effects on measured particle trajectories. Physics of Plasmas. 26(10). 18 indexed citations
8.
Barrie, A. C., Daniel L. Smith, S. R. Elkington, et al.. (2018). Wavelet Compression Performance of MMS/FPI Plasma Count Data with Plasma Environment. Earth and Space Science. 6(1). 116–135. 7 indexed citations
9.
Gershman, D. J., A. F. Viñas, J. Dorelli, et al.. (2018). Energy partitioning constraints at kinetic scales in low-β turbulence. Physics of Plasmas. 25(2). 21 indexed citations
10.
Zhang, Y. C., B. Lavraud, Lei Dai, et al.. (2017). Quantitative analysis of a Hall system in the exhaust of asymmetric magnetic reconnection. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 122(5). 5277–5289. 26 indexed citations
11.
Gershman, D. J., L. A. Avanov, S. A. Boardsen, et al.. (2017). Spacecraft and Instrument Photoelectrons Measured by the Dual Electron Spectrometers on MMS. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 122(11). 41 indexed citations
13.
Barrie, A. C., S. E. Smith, J. Dorelli, et al.. (2016). Performance of a space‐based wavelet compressor for plasma count data on the MMS Fast Plasma Investigation. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 122(1). 765–779. 9 indexed citations
14.
Fuselier, S. A., W. S. Lewis, C. Schiff, et al.. (2014). Magnetospheric Multiscale Science Mission Profile and Operations. Space Science Reviews. 199(1-4). 77–103. 114 indexed citations
15.
Schiff, C.. (2006). Adapting Covariance Propagation to Account for the Presence of Modeled and Unmodeled Maneuvers. AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit. 5 indexed citations
16.
Schiff, C., et al.. (2004). Calipso's Mission Design: Sun-Glint Avoidance Strategies. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 1 indexed citations
17.
Schiff, C., et al.. (2002). A Preliminary Study for a Tetrahedron Formation: Quality Factors and Visualization. AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit. 23 indexed citations
18.
Schiff, C., et al.. (2001). Application of Monte-Carlo Analyses for the Microwave Anisotropy Probe (MAP) Mission. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 3 indexed citations
19.
Schiff, C., et al.. (2000). Formation Flying In Highly Elliptical Orbits Initializing the Formation. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 11 indexed citations
20.
Carrico, J. P., et al.. (1993). An interactive tool for design and support of lunar, gravity assist, and libration point trajectories. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026