This map shows the geographic impact of H. U. Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. U. Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. U. Schmidt more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. U. Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. U. Schmidt. The network helps show where H. U. Schmidt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. U. Schmidt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. U. Schmidt.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. U. Schmidt based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with H. U. Schmidt. H. U. Schmidt is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schlichenmaier, R., Katharina Jähn, & H. U. Schmidt. (1998). Magnetic flux tubes evolving in sunspots. A model for the penumbral fine structure and the Evershed flow. 337(3). 897–910.11 indexed citations
2.
Schlichenmaier, R., Katharina Jähn, & H. U. Schmidt. (1996). Dynamics of a magnetic flux tube in the penumbra.. 12. 90.1 indexed citations
3.
Wegmann, R., H. Rauer, & H. U. Schmidt. (1993). The Effect of Discontinuities in the Solar Wind on the Plasma Tails of Comets. 81.3 indexed citations
Schmidt, H. U., R. Wegmann, & F. M. Neubauer. (1986). MHD-model for Comet Halley. ESASP. 250. 43–46.6 indexed citations
7.
Huebner, W. F., D. C. Boice, J. J. Keady, H. U. Schmidt, & R. Wegmann. (1986). A Model of the Coma of Comet Halley. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 18. 790.1 indexed citations
8.
Cosmovici, C. B., et al.. (1986). Groundbased CCD-observations of Comet Halley with the Giotto-HMC-filters. ESASP. 250. 375–379.1 indexed citations
9.
Huebner, W. F., H. U. Keller, K. Wilhelm, et al.. (1986). Dust-gas interaction deduced from Halley multicolor camera observations. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 250. 363.4 indexed citations
10.
Wilhelm, K., C. B. Cosmovici, W. A. Delamere, et al.. (1986). A three-dimensional model of the nucleus of Comet Halley. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society). 250. 367–369.10 indexed citations
11.
Schmidt, H. U., H. C. Spruit, & N. O. Weiss. (1986). Energy transport in sunspot penumbrae.. 158. 351–360.7 indexed citations
12.
Neubauer, F. M., G. Musmann, M. H. Acuña, et al.. (1983). The Giotto magnetic field investigation. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 1070. 145–154.8 indexed citations
13.
Kippenhahn, Rudolf, H. U. Schmidt, & H. C. Thomas. (1980). UBV photometry of HZ HER : the shape of the primary minimum.. 90. 54.2 indexed citations
14.
MacQueen, R. M., J. T. Gosling, E. Hildner, et al.. (1975). Photography of comet Kohoutek by Skylab white light coronagraph.. NASA Special Publication. 355. 19.1 indexed citations
15.
Meyer, F. & H. U. Schmidt. (1968). A Model for the Evershed Flaw in Sunspots. 25. 194.8 indexed citations
16.
Schmidt, H. U., et al.. (1968). The Influence of the Solar Corona on the Tail of Comet Ikeya-Seki 1965 VIII. 25. 211.1 indexed citations
17.
Schmidt, H. U., et al.. (1968). Magnetically Aligned Flows in the Solar Atmosphere.. 73. 72.3 indexed citations
Schmidt, H. U.. (1964). On the observable effects of magnetic energy storage and release connected with solar flares. NASA Special Publication. 50. 107.15 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.