W. Kratz

34 papers receiving 595 citations

Peers

W. Kratz
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Soil Science 257
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 203
  • Numerical Analysis 54
  • Insect Science 99
  • Global and Planetary Change 138
Replace Xingchang Wang with:
Xingchang Wang China
George S. Innis United States
John D. Miller United States
Hideyuki Kawaguchi Japan
David H. Anderson United States
Ward Canada
Pavel Grabarnik Russia
Benee F. Swindel United States
N. A. Trahan United States
G.H. Tomlinson United Kingdom
W. Kratz relative to Xingchang Wang China Xingchang Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Xingchang Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. Kratz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Kratz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Kratz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Kratz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Kratz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Kratz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Kratz. The network helps show where W. Kratz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. Kratz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. Kratz Line = papers co-authored together W. Kratz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993408
2
Litter mass loss in pine forests of Europe and Eastern United States as compared to actual evapotranspiration on a European scale
199327
3 198724
4 198722
5 201021
6 199920
7 199019
8 198516
9 196013
10 198912
11 198710
12 195810
13 197910
14 19887
15 19897
16 20137
17 19907
18 19776
19 19836
20 19815

About W. Kratz

W. Kratz is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Statistics and Probability, Civil and Structural Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 40 papers that have together received 695 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Approximation Theory and Sequence Spaces (6 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (5 papers), Engineering and Materials Science Studies (5 papers), Civil and Structural Engineering Research (4 papers), Structural Analysis of Composite Materials (3 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (2 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (2 papers) and Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (257 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (203 citations), Numerical Analysis (54 citations), Insect Science (99 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (138 citations). W. Kratz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include M. M. Coûteaux, Matty P. Berg, Pietro Piussi, Eino Mälkönen, V. Meentemeyer, Antonio Gallardo, P. Bottner, A. I. Breymeyer, Jean‐François Remacle and Alfonso Escudero. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, Environmental Sciences Europe, Mathematische Annalen, Biology and Fertility of Soils and Biogeochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact