W J Stark

51 papers receiving 951 citations

Peers

W J Stark
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 666
  • Ophthalmology 568
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 312
  • Epidemiology 124
  • Molecular Biology 93
Replace Thomas E. Gillette with:
Thomas E. Gillette United States
S. Arthur Boruchoff United States
Tohru Sakimoto Japan
C. Migdal United Kingdom
Thabo Lapp Germany
Patricia Udaondo Spain
Marc Schargus Germany
Martina Angi Italy
Anshoo Choudhary United Kingdom
Valliammai Muthappan United States
W J Stark relative to Thomas E. Gillette United States Thomas E. Gillette's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Thomas E. Gillette · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W J Stark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W J Stark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W J Stark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W J Stark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W J Stark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W J Stark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W J Stark. The network helps show where W J Stark may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W J Stark

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W J Stark. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W J Stark based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W J Stark. W J Stark is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 12
2 8
3 11
4 10
5 7
6 34
7 20
8 63
9 5
10 16
11 6
12
Current surgical management of aphakia.
1
13
In vitro immunological function of human corneal fibroblasts.
8
14
Keratoconus. Contact lens or keratoplasty?
104
15 33
16
Coagulation properties of intraocular humors and cerebrospinal fluid.
4
17 15
18
Clinical specular microscopy.
38
19
Regeneration of corneal epithelial basement membrane following thermal cauterization.
25
20
[Abnormally long processus styloideus as the cause of pharyngeal complaints].
2

About W J Stark

W J Stark is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal surgery and disorders (19 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (15 papers) and Corneal Surgery and Treatments (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (568 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (666 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (312 citations). W J Stark has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Gregory P. Kracher, William E. Smiddy, Lawrence W. Hirst, John D. Gottsch, Emma F. Young, Neil F. Martin, Ronald G. Michels, R A Prendergast, Irene H. Maumenee and William E. Bruner. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, British Journal of Ophthalmology and Cornea.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026