W. H. McMenemey
- Neurology top 10%
- Neurology and Historical Studies 4
- History of Medical Practice 4
- Ophthalmology top 5%
-
- Neurology and Historical Studies 4
- History of Medical Practice 4
-
- Medical History and Innovations 3
- History of Medicine Studies 2
-
- Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis 2
-
- Empathy and Medical Education 1
-
- Neonatal and fetal brain pathology 1
-
- Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus 1
- Co-authors
- W.B. RobertsonRobert MontgomeryE. K. CruickshankS. NevinStephen W. BehrmanD. P. JonesJ. N. CumingsR. M. Norman
- Cited by
- NeurologyOphthalmology
- Journals
- The Lancet (4 papers)Brain (4 papers)Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- GhanaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
W. H. McMenemey
34 papers receiving 497 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Neurology 139
- Ophthalmology 79
- Neurology 57
- Genetics 46
- Immunology 89
Countries citing papers authored by W. H. McMenemey
This map shows the geographic impact of W. H. McMenemey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. H. McMenemey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. H. McMenemey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. H. McMenemey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. H. McMenemey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. H. McMenemey. The network helps show where W. H. McMenemey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 13 scholars most cited alongside W. H. McMenemey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1973 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1969 | 9 | |
| 3 | 1969 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1969 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1967 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1966 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1965 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1964 | 1 | |
| 9 | Selective vulnerability of the brain in hypoxaemia : [proceedings of] a symposium organized by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences established under the joint auspices of UNESCo & WHO | 1963 | 2 |
| 10 | 1963 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1963 | 15 | |
| 12 | 1962 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1961 | 6 | |
| 14 | 1960 | 14 | |
| 15 | 1960 | 8 | |
| 16 | 1959 | 36 | |
| 17 | 1958 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1958 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1957 | 24 | |
| 20 | 1953 | 1 |
About W. H. McMenemey
W. H. McMenemey is a scholar working on Neurology, Neurology and Family Practice, having authored 38 papers that have together received 617 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurology and Historical Studies (4 papers), History of Medical Practice (4 papers), Medical History and Innovations (3 papers), History of Medicine Studies (2 papers), Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis (2 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (1 paper), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (1 paper) and Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (139 citations), Ophthalmology (79 citations) and Neurology (57 citations). W. H. McMenemey has collaborated with scholars based in Ghana, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include W.B. Robertson, Robert Montgomery, E. K. Cruickshank, S. Nevin, Stephen W. Behrman, D. P. Jones, J. N. Cumings, R. M. Norman, H. Urich and Robert S. Allison. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Brain and Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.