W. E. King
Impact in
- Hepatology top 10%
- Liver Diseases and Immunity
- Liver Disease and Transplantation
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
- Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Papers in
- Surgery 6
- Diverticular Disease and Complications 3
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis 2
-
- Liver Diseases and Immunity 1
- Co-authors
- Richard A. Joske (2 shared papers)Kenneth F. Fairley (2 shared papers)J. K. Dawborn (2 shared papers)Eric G. Saint (1 shared paper)E.S. Finckh (1 shared paper)David J. Fone (1 shared paper)Joseph Hirsh (1 shared paper)B Ungár (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Medical Journal of Australia (6 papers)QJM (1 paper)The Lancet (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)Geological Society of America eBooks (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
W. E. King
14 papers receiving 336 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Hepatology 119
- Pharmacology 61
- Nephrology 35
- Gastroenterology 20
- Epidemiology 117
Countries citing papers authored by W. E. King
This map shows the geographic impact of W. E. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. E. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. E. King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. E. King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. E. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. E. King. The network helps show where W. E. King may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside W. E. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1955 | 129 | |
| 2 | The association of peptic ulceration, chronic renal disease, and analgesic abuse. | 1966 | 103 |
| 3 | 1953 | 55 | |
| 4 | 1966 | 55 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 6 | 1964 | 15 | |
| 7 | 1958 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1964 | 9 | |
| 9 | 1953 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1954 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1956 | 6 | |
| 12 | 1951 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1962 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1957 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1958 | 1 |
About W. E. King
W. E. King is a scholar working on Surgery, Hepatology, Oncology, Paleontology and Ophthalmology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 428 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diverticular Disease and Complications (3 papers), Eosinophilic Esophagitis (2 papers), Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (1 paper), Liver Diseases and Immunity (1 paper), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (1 paper), History of Medical Practice (1 paper), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (1 paper) and Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (119 citations), Pharmacology (61 citations), Nephrology (35 citations), Gastroenterology (20 citations) and Epidemiology (117 citations). W. E. King has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard A. Joske, Kenneth F. Fairley, J. K. Dawborn, Eric G. Saint, E.S. Finckh, David J. Fone, Joseph Hirsh, B Ungár, James P. Madigan and Wayne Holman. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, QJM, The Lancet, PubMed and Geological Society of America eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.