Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Doing Research on Sensitive Topics
1995700 citationsW. E. J. McCarthy et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by W. E. J. McCarthy
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of W. E. J. McCarthy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. E. J. McCarthy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. E. J. McCarthy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. E. J. McCarthy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. E. J. McCarthy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. E. J. McCarthy. The network helps show where W. E. J. McCarthy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. E. J. McCarthy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. E. J. McCarthy.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. E. J. McCarthy based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with W. E. J. McCarthy. W. E. J. McCarthy is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Geerts, Guido L. & W. E. J. McCarthy. (1999). Expert opinion [accounting]. IEEE Intelligent Systems and their Applications. 14(4). 89–94.88 indexed citations
4.
McCarthy, W. E. J.. (1997). New Labour at work : reforming the labour market. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).1 indexed citations
Cherrington, J. Owen, et al.. (1993). Event-Driven Business Solutions: Implementation Experiences and Issues.. International Conference on Information Systems. 394–395.2 indexed citations
8.
McCarthy, W. E. J.. (1992). Legal intervention in industrial relations : gains and losses. Blackwell eBooks.27 indexed citations
McCarthy, W. E. J., et al.. (1983). Strikes in post-war Britain: A study of stoppages of work due to industrial disputes, 1946-73. Medical Entomology and Zoology.14 indexed citations
12.
McCarthy, W. E. J. & Graham Gal. (1981). Declarative and Procedural Features of a CODASYL Accounting System. 195–211.6 indexed citations
13.
McCarthy, W. E. J., et al.. (1975). Wage Inflation and Wage Leadership: A Study of the Role of Key Wage Bargains in the Irish System of Collective Bargaining. Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin).4 indexed citations
McCarthy, W. E. J., et al.. (1973). Management by agreement: An alternative to the Industrial Relations Act,. Medical Entomology and Zoology.6 indexed citations
McCarthy, W. E. J. & Stanley Parker. (1968). Shop stewards and workshop relations : the results of a study undertaken by the Government Social Survey for the Royal Commission on Trade Unions Employers' Associations. HMSO eBooks.7 indexed citations
18.
Stieber, Jack, et al.. (1968). Three studies in collective bargaining. HMSO eBooks.3 indexed citations
19.
McCarthy, W. E. J., et al.. (1968). Disputes procedures in Britain. HMSO eBooks.
20.
McCarthy, W. E. J.. (1966). The role of shop stewards in British Industrial relations : a survey of existing information and research. HMSO eBooks.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.