W. E. Gillies

1.3k citations
80 papers · 923 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

W. E. Gillies

77 papers receiving 850 citations

Peers

W. E. Gillies
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Ophthalmology 760
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 379
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 144
  • Neurology 33
  • Neurology 60
Replace John Hetherington with:
John Hetherington United States
B. Thomas Hutchinson United States
Essam A. Osman Saudi Arabia
H. N. BERNSTEIN Canada
İmren Akkoyun Türkiye
Nihal Demircan Türkiye
Francesco Parmeggiani Italy
Masashi Fujihara Japan
Yolanda Wong Ying Yip Hong Kong
Benjamin Nicholson United States
W. E. Gillies relative to John Hetherington United States John Hetherington's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
John Hetherington · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. E. Gillies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. E. Gillies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. E. Gillies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. E. Gillies more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. E. Gillies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. E. Gillies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. E. Gillies. The network helps show where W. E. Gillies may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside W. E. Gillies, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. E. Gillies Line = papers co-authored together W. E. Gillies links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199293
2 198871
3 198367
4 198765
5 198932
6 200232
7 199629
8 199125
9 199122
10 198721
11 197020
12 198620
13 198816
14 199116
15 198815
16 197315
17 198813
18 198812
19 199112
20 198512

About W. E. Gillies

W. E. Gillies is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 80 papers that have together received 923 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (52 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (22 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (21 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (20 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (11 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (9 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (6 papers) and Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (760 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (379 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (144 citations), Neurology (33 citations) and Neurology (60 citations). W. E. Gillies has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include ANNE M. V. BROOKS, Robert West, C Alex Harper, David A. Mackey, Christopher H.S. Chan, Justin O’Day, Elizabeth C. Engle, Wai‐Man Chan, Mark Scott and Ian Hurley. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology, Cornea, Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina and The Medical Journal of Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact