Vivian Shapiro
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Safety Research top 2%
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers)Child Welfare and Adoption (3 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers)
- Journals
- Infant Mental Health JournalThe Psychoanalytic Study of the ChildSocial Work in Health Care
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsBelgium
In The Last Decade
Vivian Shapiro
12 papers receiving 918 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Clinical Psychology 947
- Social Psychology 370
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 228
- Sociology and Political Science 186
- Safety Research 158
Countries citing papers authored by Vivian Shapiro
This map shows the geographic impact of Vivian Shapiro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vivian Shapiro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vivian Shapiro more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Vivian Shapiro
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vivian Shapiro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vivian Shapiro. The network helps show where Vivian Shapiro may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vivian Shapiro
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vivian Shapiro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vivian Shapiro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Vivian Shapiro. Vivian Shapiro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | Complex adoption and assisted reproductive technology : a developmental approach to clinical practice | 8 |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | [Ghosts in the nursery. A psychoanalytic approach to problems which affect the mother-infant relations]. | 9 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | GHOSTS IN THE NURSERY: A PSYCHOANALYTIC APPROACH TO IMPAIRED INFANT-MOTHER RELATIONSHIPS | 34 |
| 12 | Ghosts in the Nurserybreakdown → | 998 |
About Vivian Shapiro
Vivian Shapiro is a scholar working on General Psychology, Safety Research and Clinical Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (3 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (947 citations), Safety Research (158 citations) and Social Psychology (370 citations). Vivian Shapiro has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Edna Adelson, Selma Fraiberg, Janet Shapiro, Nancy Boyd Webb, Debbie Indyk and John W. Bennett. Their work appears in journals such as Infant Mental Health Journal, The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child and Social Work in Health Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.