Viola Gesellchen
Impact in
- Immunology top 10%
- Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
- Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
- interferon and immune responses
- Insect Science top 5%
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
Papers in
-
- Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms 6
- Aquaculture disease management and microbiota 3
- interferon and immune responses 2
-
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences 2
- Co-authors
- Michael BoutrosDavid KuttenkeulerPatrick MüllerMartin P. ZeidlerNadège PelteAnan RagabMichael SteckelJules A. Hoffmann
- Journals
- Differentiation (1 paper)The EMBO Journal (1 paper)Journal of Innate Immunity (1 paper)Journal of Proteome Research (1 paper)Nature Immunology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyBelgiumUnited States
In The Last Decade
Viola Gesellchen
9 papers receiving 798 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Immunology 385
- Insect Science 178
- Aging 21
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 113
- Molecular Biology 426
Countries citing papers authored by Viola Gesellchen
This map shows the geographic impact of Viola Gesellchen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Viola Gesellchen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Viola Gesellchen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Viola Gesellchen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Viola Gesellchen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Viola Gesellchen. The network helps show where Viola Gesellchen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Viola Gesellchen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 67 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 105 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 47 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 192 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 106 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 235 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 17 |
About Viola Gesellchen
Viola Gesellchen is a scholar working on Immunology, Insect Science, Microbiology, Oncology and Cancer Research, having authored 9 papers that have together received 808 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (6 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (3 papers), Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions (3 papers), interferon and immune responses (2 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (2 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (1 paper), Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (1 paper) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology (385 citations), Insect Science (178 citations), Aging (21 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (113 citations) and Molecular Biology (426 citations). Viola Gesellchen has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Boutros, David Kuttenkeuler, Patrick Müller, Martin P. Zeidler, Nadège Pelte, Anan Ragab, Michael Steckel, Jules A. Hoffmann, Jean-Marc Reichhart and Osamu Takeuchi. Their work appears in journals such as Differentiation, The EMBO Journal, Journal of Innate Immunity, Journal of Proteome Research and Nature Immunology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.