Vincent Vargas
- Mathematical Physics top 2%
- Condensed Matter Physics top 5%
- Statistics and Probability top 2%
- Geometry and Topology top 5%
- Finance top 5%
- Co-authors
- Rémi RhodesRaoul RobertA. KupiainenFrançois DavidBertrand DuplantierScott Sheffield⋆Christophe GarbanJean Duchon
- Topics
- Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (19 papers)Theoretical and Computational Physics (11 papers)Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (10 papers)
In The Last Decade
Vincent Vargas
37 papers receiving 690 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Mathematical Physics 526
- Condensed Matter Physics 208
- Statistics and Probability 174
- Geometry and Topology 152
- Finance 146
Countries citing papers authored by Vincent Vargas
This map shows the geographic impact of Vincent Vargas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vincent Vargas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vincent Vargas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Vincent Vargas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vincent Vargas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vincent Vargas. The network helps show where Vincent Vargas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vincent Vargas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vincent Vargas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vincent Vargas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Vincent Vargas. Vincent Vargas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 161 | |
| 13 | Large deviations for random surfaces: the hyperbolic nature of Liouville Field Theory | 1 |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | Levy multiplicative chaos and star scale invariant random measures | 6 |
| 16 | Star-scale invariant random measures | 2 |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 13 |
About Vincent Vargas
Vincent Vargas is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Finance and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 41 papers that have together received 743 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (19 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (11 papers) and Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (526 citations), Statistics and Probability (174 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (208 citations). Vincent Vargas has collaborated with scholars based in France, Burundi and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Rémi Rhodes, Raoul Robert, A. Kupiainen, François David, Bertrand Duplantier, Scott Sheffield⋆, Christophe Garban, Jean Duchon, Laurent Chevillard and Julien Barral. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of High Energy Physics, Communications in Mathematical Physics and Annals of Mathematics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.