Victoria E. White

26 papers receiving 568 citations

Peers

Victoria E. White
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Horticulture 21
  • General Psychology 18
  • Social Psychology 237
  • Clinical Psychology 214
  • Insect Science 77
Replace Ram Dass with:
Ram Dass India
Robert L. Haynes United States
Jillian Fish United States
W. J. Reid United States
Helen Klieve Australia
Manny Sternlicht Israel
Paul L. Schneider United States
Eric M. Hansen Sweden
Gul Muhammad Baloch Pakistan
Kathleen P. Allen United States
Victoria E. White relative to Ram Dass India Ram Dass's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Ram Dass · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Victoria E. White

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Victoria E. White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Victoria E. White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Victoria E. White more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Victoria E. White

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Victoria E. White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Victoria E. White. The network helps show where Victoria E. White may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Victoria E. White, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Victoria E. White Line = papers co-authored together Victoria E. White links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002130
2 201275
3 200169
4 200363
5 199839
6
Passing notes: The use of therapeutic letter writing in counseling adolescents.
200232
7 201230
8 200228
9 200324
10
Developing Counseling Objectives and Empowering Clients: A Strength-Based Intervention.
200223
11 201222
12 200320
13 200119
14 199617
15 200013
16 198512
17 201311
18 20005
19 19905
20 20025

About Victoria E. White

Victoria E. White is a scholar working on Insect Science, Clinical Psychology, Plant Science, Genetics and Social Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 653 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (6 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (4 papers), Advances in Cucurbitaceae Research (4 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (3 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (3 papers), Gun Ownership and Violence Research (2 papers), Teacher Professional Development and Motivation (2 papers) and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (21 citations), General Psychology (18 citations), Social Psychology (237 citations), Clinical Psychology (214 citations) and Insect Science (77 citations). Victoria E. White has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Jane E. Myers, Thomas J. Sweeney, Paul A. Schutz, Christopher J. Knowles, Melissa Murray, Cecilia McGregor, Eleni Bachlava, Steven J. Knapp, J.G. Charles and J.T.S. Walker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, Journal of Educational Psychology, Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Counseling and Values and Counselor Education and Supervision.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact