Counseling and Values

900 papers and 8.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 900 papers published in Counseling and Values in the last decades have received a total of 8.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Counseling and Values usually cover Social Psychology (492 papers), Clinical Psychology (405 papers) and Health (362 papers) specifically the topics of Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (359 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (344 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (140 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Counseling and Values are Robert D. Enright, Charles J. Downing, Craig S. Cashwell, Everett L. Worthington, Allen E. Bergin, John S. Young, Suzanne Freedman, Charles L. Seitz, Daniel A. Helminiak and Michael E. McCullough.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Counseling and Values

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Counseling and Values. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Counseling and Values.

Countries where authors publish in Counseling and Values

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Counseling and Values. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Counseling and Values with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Counseling and Values more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025