Velma L. Payne
- Family Practice top 0.5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Emergency Medical Services top 5%
- Co-authors
- Hardeep SinghAshley N. D. MeyerSylvia J. HysongMark L. GraberDerek W MeeksNancy LenfesteyElizabeth TantK Henriksen
- Topics
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (9 papers)Patient Safety and Medication Errors (4 papers)Radiology practices and education (4 papers)
- Journals
- Mayo Clinic ProceedingsJAMA Internal MedicineJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Velma L. Payne
14 papers receiving 811 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Family Practice 468
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 289
- General Health Professions 206
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 162
- Emergency Medical Services 123
Countries citing papers authored by Velma L. Payne
This map shows the geographic impact of Velma L. Payne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Velma L. Payne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Velma L. Payne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Velma L. Payne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Velma L. Payne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Velma L. Payne. The network helps show where Velma L. Payne may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Velma L. Payne
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Velma L. Payne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Velma L. Payne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Velma L. Payne. Velma L. Payne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 79 | |
| 5 | 48 | |
| 6 | 67 | |
| 7 | 45 | |
| 8 | 169 | |
| 9 | 322 | |
| 10 | EFFECT OF A METACOGNITIVE INTERVENTION ON COGNITIVE HEURISTIC USE DURING DIAGNOSTIC REASONING | 6 |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 39 | |
| 13 | Assessing the use of cognitive heuristic representativeness in clinical reasoning. | 13 |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | Web-based communication to enhance outcomes: a case study in patient relations. | 5 |
About Velma L. Payne
Velma L. Payne is a scholar working on Family Practice, Health Information Management and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 15 papers that have together received 838 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (9 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (4 papers) and Radiology practices and education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (468 citations), Health Informatics (39 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (123 citations). Velma L. Payne has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Hardeep Singh, Ashley N. D. Meyer, Sylvia J. Hysong, Mark L. Graber, Derek W Meeks, Nancy Lenfestey, Elizabeth Tant, K Henriksen, Kenneth A. LaBresh and Asta Sorensen. Their work appears in journals such as Mayo Clinic Proceedings, JAMA Internal Medicine and Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.