JAMA Internal Medicine

3.2k papers and 155.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.2k papers published in JAMA Internal Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 155.1k indexed citations. Papers published in JAMA Internal Medicine usually cover General Health Professions (777 papers), Economics and Econometrics (641 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (604 papers) specifically the topics of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (342 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (297 papers) and Healthcare cost, quality, practices (240 papers). The most active scholars publishing in JAMA Internal Medicine are Nicole Lurie, Rachelle Bernacki, Vinay Prasad, Susan D. Block, Raina M. Merchant, Sandro Galea, Chris Del Mar, Anupam B. Jena, Frank B. Hu and Bruce E. Landon.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in JAMA Internal Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in JAMA Internal Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in JAMA Internal Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in JAMA Internal Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in JAMA Internal Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in JAMA Internal Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JAMA Internal Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025