Vanita Sundaram

816 total citations
34 papers, 458 citations indexed

About

Vanita Sundaram is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Vanita Sundaram has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 458 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Gender Studies, 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 7 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Vanita Sundaram's work include Gender Roles and Identity Studies (6 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (5 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers). Vanita Sundaram is often cited by papers focused on Gender Roles and Identity Studies (6 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (5 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers). Vanita Sundaram collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Australia. Vanita Sundaram's co-authors include Carolyn Jackson, Helen Sauntson, Karin Helweg‐Larsen, Bjarne Laursen, Ping Qin, Chris Kyriacou, Ingunn T. Ellingsen, Paul Stephens, Sultan Barakat and Frank Hardman and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

In The Last Decade

Vanita Sundaram

31 papers receiving 423 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Vanita Sundaram United Kingdom 14 153 152 133 124 88 34 458
Marta Ferragut Spain 15 113 0.7× 136 0.9× 107 0.8× 193 1.6× 79 0.9× 27 433
Rhea Almeida United States 15 225 1.5× 66 0.4× 135 1.0× 329 2.7× 74 0.8× 28 638
Gita R. Mehrotra United States 11 181 1.2× 115 0.8× 90 0.7× 80 0.6× 60 0.7× 31 442
Deborah Epstein United States 12 282 1.8× 199 1.3× 302 2.3× 140 1.1× 67 0.8× 25 559
Fariyal Ross-Sheriff United States 10 251 1.6× 89 0.6× 68 0.5× 131 1.1× 49 0.6× 24 426
David T. Mayeda United States 10 188 1.2× 80 0.5× 75 0.6× 132 1.1× 77 0.9× 33 387
Kathryn A. Branch United States 12 247 1.6× 242 1.6× 205 1.5× 119 1.0× 35 0.4× 22 490
Saskia Keuzenkamp Netherlands 13 231 1.5× 89 0.6× 28 0.2× 91 0.7× 41 0.5× 61 469
Elizabeth Armstrong United States 7 172 1.1× 174 1.1× 36 0.3× 92 0.7× 17 0.2× 15 482
Lisa L. Frey United States 10 134 0.9× 110 0.7× 70 0.5× 189 1.5× 63 0.7× 18 415

Countries citing papers authored by Vanita Sundaram

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Vanita Sundaram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vanita Sundaram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vanita Sundaram more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Vanita Sundaram

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vanita Sundaram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vanita Sundaram. The network helps show where Vanita Sundaram may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vanita Sundaram

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vanita Sundaram. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vanita Sundaram based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Vanita Sundaram. Vanita Sundaram is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sundaram, Vanita, et al.. (2025). What do we mean by a whole-school approach to gender-related violence prevention? A critical exploration of existing models. Gender and Education. 37(7). 741–759. 1 indexed citations
2.
Raja, Gunasekaran, et al.. (2025). Emergency Vehicle Navigation in Connected Autonomous Systems Using Enhanced Traffic Management System. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. 12(12). 20670–20677.
4.
Jackson, Carolyn & Vanita Sundaram. (2020). Lad Culture in Higher Education. 29 indexed citations
5.
Jackson, Carolyn & Vanita Sundaram. (2018). ‘I have a sense that it's probably quite bad … but because I don't see it, I don't know’: staff perspectives on ‘lad culture’ in higher education. Gender and Education. 33(4). 435–450. 22 indexed citations
6.
Sundaram, Vanita & Helen Sauntson. (2016). Global perspectives and key debates in sex and relationships education. Palgrave Macmillan eBooks. 4 indexed citations
7.
Davies, Ian, et al.. (2014). Creating citizenship communities: education, young people and the role of schools. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 8 indexed citations
8.
Ripamonti, Caterina, G. Bruce Henning, Robin R. Ali, et al.. (2014). Nature of the Visual Loss in Observers With Leber's Congenital Amaurosis Caused by Specific Mutations in RPE65. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55(10). 6817–6828. 14 indexed citations
9.
Davies, Ian, et al.. (2014). Creating Citizenship Communities. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4 indexed citations
10.
Sundaram, Vanita. (2014). Preventing Youth Violence. Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks. 8 indexed citations
11.
Hampden‐Thompson, Gillian & Vanita Sundaram. (2013). Developing quantitative research skills and conceptualising an integrated approach to teaching research methods to education students. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 5(3). 5 indexed citations
12.
Wattam-Bell, John, Koji Nishiguchi, Vanita Sundaram, et al.. (2013). Cortical visual processing in patients with congenital achromatopsia: coherent form, motion and biological motion perception. Journal of Vision. 13(9). 21–21. 1 indexed citations
13.
Davies, Ian, et al.. (2013). Creating citizenship communities project report. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 1 indexed citations
14.
Kyriacou, Chris, Ingunn T. Ellingsen, Paul Stephens, & Vanita Sundaram. (2009). Social pedagogy and the teacher: England and Norway compared. Pedagogy Culture and Society. 17(1). 75–87. 33 indexed citations
15.
Sundaram, Vanita, et al.. (2006). Suicide Risk Among Persons with Foreign Background in Denmark. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. 36(4). 481–489. 23 indexed citations
16.
Davidsen, Michael, et al.. (2005). Indicators Associated with Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempts Among 16–35‐Year‐Old Danes: A National Representative Population Study. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. 35(3). 291–308. 18 indexed citations
17.
Sundaram, Vanita, Tine Curtis, Karin Helweg‐Larsen, & Peter Bjerregaard. (2004). Can we compare violence data across countries?. International Journal of Circumpolar Health. 63(sup2). 389–396. 10 indexed citations
18.
Helweg‐Larsen, Karin, et al.. (2004). The Danish Youth Survey 2002: asking young people about sensitive issues. International Journal of Circumpolar Health. 63(sup2). 147–152. 14 indexed citations
19.
Sundaram, Vanita, et al.. (2003). Physical violence, self rated health, and morbidity: is gender significant for victimisation?. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 58(1). 65–70. 70 indexed citations
20.
Sundaram, Vanita, et al.. (1980). Automated enzymic determination of glycerol in beverages by an immobilized glycerol dehydrogenase nylon-tube reactor. European Food Research and Technology. 171(6). 449–450. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026