Vance Wong

528 citations
14 papers · 401 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Vance Wong

14 papers receiving 391 citations

Peers

Vance Wong
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 182
  • Spectroscopy 95
  • Biophysics 19
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 39
  • Molecular Biology 152
Replace Diego Frezzato with:
Diego Frezzato Italy
Mitsunori Takano Japan
Nélido González-Segredo United Kingdom
Mark Buchanan United States
Matteo Gori France
Gene Lamm United States
Atipat Rojnuckarin United States
Canan Baysal Türkiye
Rajib Biswas India
Andrew Shaw United States
Vance Wong relative to Diego Frezzato Italy Diego Frezzato's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Diego Frezzato · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Vance Wong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Vance Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vance Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vance Wong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Vance Wong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vance Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vance Wong. The network helps show where Vance Wong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Vance Wong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Vance Wong Line = papers co-authored together Vance Wong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2007117
2 200469
3 199953
4 200649
5 200942
6 200119
7 200616
8 20029
9 20049
10 20067
11 20065
12 20024
13 20001
14 20251

About Vance Wong

Vance Wong is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Spectroscopy, Condensed Matter Physics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 401 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (3 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (2 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (2 papers), Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (2 papers), NMR spectroscopy and applications (2 papers) and Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (182 citations), Spectroscopy (95 citations), Biophysics (19 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (39 citations) and Molecular Biology (152 citations). Vance Wong has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include David A. Case, Mark A. Ratner, Martin Gruebele, Alessandro Troisi, Attila Szabó, Cristina‐Maria Hirschbiegel, Vincent M. Rotello and Cheng‐Hsuan Li. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Optical Society of America B, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Physical Review A and Chemical Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact