Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications
19974.0k citationsMark A. Ratner et al.Physics Todayprofile →
Countries citing papers authored by Mark A. Ratner
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark A. Ratner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark A. Ratner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark A. Ratner more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark A. Ratner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark A. Ratner. The network helps show where Mark A. Ratner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark A. Ratner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark A. Ratner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark A. Ratner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark A. Ratner. Mark A. Ratner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Zhan, Xiaowei, Antonio Facchetti, Stephen Barlow, et al.. (2010). Rylene and Related Diimides for Organic Electronics. Advanced Materials. 23(2). 268–284.1610 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Ratner, Mark A., David Bradley, & Daniel Becker. (2005). Lilly holds onto Zyprexa patent. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 4(6). 450–450.1 indexed citations
10.
Ratner, Mark A., et al.. (2004). New Books. Physics Today. 57(12). 72–72.1 indexed citations
11.
Aviram, Ari, Vladimiro Mújica, & Mark A. Ratner. (2002). Annals of the New York Academy Sciences: Introduction. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 960.11 indexed citations
12.
Cao, Hui, et al.. (2002). Investigation of random lasers with resonant feedback. APS.6 indexed citations
13.
Ratner, Mark A.. (2000). Conductance of Molecular Wires. APS March Meeting Abstracts.1 indexed citations
14.
Ratner, Mark A.. (1999). Introduction to Ionomers, by Adi Eisenberg and Joon-Seop Kim. Physics Today. 52(2). 68.2 indexed citations
15.
Jortner, Joshua & Mark A. Ratner. (1997). Molecular electronics : a 'chemistry for the 21st century' monograph. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).25 indexed citations
16.
Ratner, Mark A.. (1997). Understanding molecular simulation: From algorithms to applications, by Daan Frenkel and Berend Smit. Physics Today. 50(7). 66.17 indexed citations
17.
Winship, Christopher & Mark A. Ratner. (1995). Power to the Pedagogues.2 indexed citations
18.
Schatz, George C. & Mark A. Ratner. (1993). Quantum mechanics in chemistry. CERN Bulletin.196 indexed citations
19.
Ratner, Mark A.. (1991). Polymer solid electrolytes. Charge transport mechanisms. 15(1). 1–15.1 indexed citations
20.
Bowman, Joel M. & Mark A. Ratner. (1991). Advances in molecular vibrations and collision dynamics : a research annual. JAI Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.