В. В. Цома
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
- Epidemiology
- Physiology
- Neurology
- Co-authors
- С. В. НедогодаA. A. LedyaevaA. S. SalasyukЕ. В. ЧумачекС. Н. АвдеевИ. В. ДемкоИ. В. Лещенко
- Topics
- Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (14 papers)Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (8 papers)Sodium Intake and Health (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineEndocrine and Autonomic SystemsEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaClinical Drug InvestigationTerapevticheskii arkhiv
- Partner nations
- RussiaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
В. В. Цома
17 papers receiving 70 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 52
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 21
- Epidemiology 19
- Physiology 13
- Neurology 10
Countries citing papers authored by В. В. Цома
This map shows the geographic impact of В. В. Цома's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by В. В. Цома with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites В. В. Цома more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by В. В. Цома
This network shows the impact of papers produced by В. В. Цома. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by В. В. Цома. The network helps show where В. В. Цома may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of В. В. Цома
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of В. В. Цома. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of В. В. Цома based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with В. В. Цома. В. В. Цома is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 43 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | MILDRONATE POTENTIAL FOR CORRECTING COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION | 1 |
About В. В. Цома
В. В. Цома is a scholar working on Anatomy, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Neurology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 77 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (14 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (8 papers) and Sodium Intake and Health (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (52 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (9 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (21 citations). В. В. Цома has collaborated with scholars based in Russia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include С. В. Недогода, A. A. Ledyaeva, A. S. Salasyuk, Е. В. Чумачек, С. Н. Авдеев, И. В. Демко and И. В. Лещенко. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Clinical Drug Investigation and Terapevticheskii arkhiv.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.