В. Н. Самарцев
- Molecular Biology
- Physiology top 10%
- Clinical Biochemistry top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Biochemistry
- Co-authors
- E. N. MokhovaVladimir P. SkulachevMikhail V. DubininО. В. МарковаKonstantin N. BelosludtsevNikita V. PenkovV.I. DedukhovaА. В. Смирнов
- Topics
- Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (46 papers)Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (25 papers)Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (19 papers)
- Journals
- Biochemical and Biophysical Research CommunicationsFEBS LettersBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes
- Partner nations
- RussiaTajikistanUnited States
In The Last Decade
В. Н. Самарцев
65 papers receiving 551 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Molecular Biology 452
- Physiology 241
- Clinical Biochemistry 113
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 70
- Biochemistry 30
Countries citing papers authored by В. Н. Самарцев
This map shows the geographic impact of В. Н. Самарцев's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by В. Н. Самарцев with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites В. Н. Самарцев more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by В. Н. Самарцев
This network shows the impact of papers produced by В. Н. Самарцев. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by В. Н. Самарцев. The network helps show where В. Н. Самарцев may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of В. Н. Самарцев
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of В. Н. Самарцев. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of В. Н. Самарцев based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with В. Н. Самарцев. В. Н. Самарцев is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 21 | |
| 20 | 62 |
About В. Н. Самарцев
В. Н. Самарцев is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Physiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 557 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (46 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (25 papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (113 citations), Physiology (241 citations) and Molecular Biology (452 citations). В. Н. Самарцев has collaborated with scholars based in Russia, Tajikistan and United States. Frequent co-authors include E. N. Mokhova, Vladimir P. Skulachev, Mikhail V. Dubinin, О. В. Маркова, Konstantin N. Belosludtsev, Nikita V. Penkov, V.I. Dedukhova, А. В. Смирнов, Ruben A. Simonyan and Natalia V. Belosludtseva. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, FEBS Letters and Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.