Thomas E. Conover

27 papers receiving 524 citations

Peers

Thomas E. Conover
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Clinical Biochemistry 94
  • Biochemistry 70
  • Molecular Biology 391
  • Toxicology 19
  • Cell Biology 83
Replace R. K. Emaus with:
R. K. Emaus United States
Giovanna Colombo United States
Jerald L. Connelly United States
Lofrumento Ne Italy
Frank D. Vasington United States
Archie L. Smith United States
Carole Hall United States
E. Walaas Norway
G. Graff United States
Mary E. Kirtley United States
Thomas E. Conover relative to R. K. Emaus United States R. K. Emaus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
R. K. Emaus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Conover

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Conover's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Conover with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Conover more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Conover

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Conover. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Conover. The network helps show where Thomas E. Conover may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. Conover, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. Conover Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. Conover links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 19919
2 19917
3 19908
4 198745
5 19821
6 19810
7 198132
8 197512
9 197011
10 197015
11 196614
12 196625
13 196323
14 196332
15 196322
16 196311
17 196399
18 196268
19 19604
20 19605

About Thomas E. Conover

Thomas E. Conover is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Biochemistry and Physiology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 608 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (8 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (4 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (4 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (3 papers), ATP Synthase and ATPases Research (3 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (3 papers), Hemoglobin structure and function (3 papers) and Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (94 citations), Biochemistry (70 citations) and Molecular Biology (391 citations). Thomas E. Conover has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Lars Ernster, Michael Bárány, Efraim Racker, Günther Siebert, Regina Schneider, Louis H. Schliselfeld, Eric Gaetjens, M Goffart, L. L. Danielson and E. Racker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Acta chemica Scandinavica/Acta chemica Scandinavica. B, Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. A, Physical and inorganic chemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series B. Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series A, Physical and inorganic chemistry, Trends in Biochemical Sciences and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026